Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT editorial: "Coward" Bush gets away with "slime" in his name

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:07 AM
Original message
LAT editorial: "Coward" Bush gets away with "slime" in his name
September 28, 2004
EDITORIAL
How Dare Kerry Speak Up

The suggestion that terrorists support Sen. John F. Kerry for president is ugly, but basically silly. The suggestion that Kerry supports the terrorists is flat-out disgusting. President Bush has allowed surrogates to spread the former idea, but he himself has helped to promote the latter. Last week, Bush declared that Kerry's criticism of him and his Iraq policy "can embolden an enemy" and called Kerry "destructive" to the war on terror.

Since election day 2000 and through his first term, Bush has talked a better game of democratic values than he has played. And he is not one for nuances in any event. But the point here is not subtle: The right to criticize the policies of those in power is not just one of democracy's fringe benefits; it is essential to making the democratic machinery work. And questions of war and peace — dead young Americans, dead Iraqis, a radicalized Middle East, billions of dollars: Was it worth all this? — are the ones that need democracy the most. Why would any president even wish to plunge this country into war and keep it there without a level of support from the citizenry that is strong enough to survive the obvious counterarguments?...

***

Kerry's position on Iraq is not a model of clarity and consistency. His critique of the Bush policy has the tang of opportunism. But he is more right than wrong, certainly more right than Bush, and in any event more within his rights to make the argument than Bush is in trying to suppress it. And, as with Vietnam, the nation's policy is gradually shifting Kerry's way. Would Bush have made even the halfhearted efforts of recent weeks to share the burden and direction of the war with the United Nations if he hadn't been looking over his shoulder at the Democratic candidate for his job? To accuse Kerry of aiding the enemy while taking his advice is despicable.

Compared with Kerry, George W. Bush is a coward. This is not a reference to their respective activities during Vietnam. It refers to the current election campaign. Bush happily benefits from the slime his supporters are spreading but refuses to take responsibility for it or to call point-blank for it to stop. He got away with this when the prime mover was the shadowy Swift boats group. Will he get away with it when the accusers are his own vice president, high officials of his own administration (Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage) and members of Congress from his own party (House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert or Sen. Orrin Hatch)? The answer is yes: Based on recent experience, he probably will get away with it.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-kerry28sep28,1,684193.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush supports terrorists and I can prove it

Documented proof that Bush supports terrorists. He supported Ansar Al Islam so he could use them to make his case for war vs. Iraq. Even was in secret negotations with them to potentially use them against Hussen, at the same time he was claiming that Hussein was in league with Ansar Al Islam as an arm of Al Qaeda.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x909236
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Great job, SCD -- nominated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes. One candidate treats the troops like little chess pieces and...
the other wants to make sure that, when they are sent to fight, it is for the right reasons.

Which candidate is more supportive of the troops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardson08 Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. The media is responsible for not taking * to task
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. bush = the media, the media = bush
they are one and the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Kerry needs to ...
call w a liar and briefly provide proof.

In the debate Kerry needs to call w a coward and state simply and briefly why w is one.

Kerry needs to state why he is the best person to lead this country against, not terrorism but al Q. He needs to point out that it was w and his inept Neo Fascist oil goons that did nothing to prevent the 911 Attacks. It is time that Kerry show his metal as he did in Nam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. allowing the surrogates to demonize for the demon himself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC