Chest Painey: The Ultimate Flip-Flopper on Iraq Occupation

[jefferson_dem]

"He was against getting bogged down in Iraq before he was for it," says Sen. Edwards in reference to punk-ass Chain-knee.

Here's a story that points it out. Is anyone listening?

WASHINGTON -- In an assessment that differs sharply with his view today, Dick Cheney more than a decade ago defended the decision to leave Saddam Hussein in power after the first Gulf War, telling a Seattle audience that capturing Saddam wouldn't be worth additional U.S. casualties or the risk of getting "bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq."

Cheney, who was secretary of defense at the time, made the observations answering audience questions after a speech to the Discovery Institute in August 1992, nearly 18 months after U.S. forces routed the Iraqi army and liberated Kuwait.

<SNIP>

"And the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam worth?" Cheney said then in response to a question.

"And the answer is not very damned many. So I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the president made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq."

<SNIP>

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/192908_cheney29.html