|
At the debates he should say something along these lines. It should be designed to appeal to wavering moderates and even principled conservatives (hence the favorable allusion to Reagan):
"Look, from the start I said we should only go to war as a last resort and with international support if we can get it. But when the President went to war in March of 2002, I supported him and I supported our troops because when my president tells me he must go to war to protect the security of the American people, I believe him. I trust him. And I trusted the President to do the right thing. I trusted him when he said there were WMDs. I trusted him when he said he would plan properly for the aftermath. I trusted him when he said war was absolutely necessary. Every single one of those assumptions has been proven wrong. My trust was entirely misplaced and every single assumption on which we went to war has been proven wrong. I would be a fool not to reconsider my position. When the facts change, I change my mind. But to you, the attitude is 'facts be damned.' You call that leadership. But true leaders - FDR, Truman, FDR, and Reagan - know that when a policy isn't working, you change course! That's common sense. And if, just because I believe that, you, Mr. President, want to call me a flip-flopper, then dammit, call me a flip-flopper!"
It totally defangs the GOP argument. They can't call him a flip-flopper if Kerry embraces it and turns it into a plus.
What do you think?
|