Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone see or hear Edwards on Imus?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 06:37 AM
Original message
Did anyone see or hear Edwards on Imus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Was_Immer Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Cute . Tell us about it. Was it a phone in? Was it good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Edwards Was Very Good

He said Imus are you with us - Imus said yes, Edwards said, good, if you are with us, we need you to be really with us and quit whining. I loved that.

"The question is, is the President finally going to come clean and tell the American people the truth about what's going on in Iraq," he told radio talk show host Don Imus. "It will be interesting to see whether he keeps trying to say everything is going well, because everyone knows that's not true."

During Wednesday morning's radio appearance, Edwards also cited a 1992 interview with Vice President Dick Cheney in which he appeared to argue against an all-out Iraqi invasion. The Cheney interview, given when he was Secretary of Defense, was reported Wednesday by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

"When he was asked why they didn't finish the job in Iraq . . . he talked about the enormous danger and risk of getting bogged down," Edwards said, "of having to govern the country. Of the casualties that would be incurred. To use some of the same language these people have used against John, he was against getting bogged down in Iraq before he was for it."

more at http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A59819-2004Sep29?language=printer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC