Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC cans Luntz!! No bogus spinning disguised as "focus group" tonight!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:26 AM
Original message
MSNBC cans Luntz!! No bogus spinning disguised as "focus group" tonight!

Thank you, David Brock!!

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html


Republican pollster canned at MSNBC



Upon hearing that MSNBC planned for Republican pollster Frank Luntz to conduct on-air focus groups as part of the cable network's debate coverage tonight, David Brock of the media watchdog group Media Matters sent MSNBC executive Rick Kaplan a letter of complaint. It looks like Kaplan listened.

Media Matters links to this Roll Call article today showing Luntz got canned. It's sub only, so here's the text:

By Mary Ann Akers
Roll Call Staff
September 30, 2004
The watchdog organization Media Matters for America was none too pleased that MSNBC had scheduled GOP pollster Frank Luntz conduct on-air focus groups following tonight's presidential debate.

In a letter to MSNBC President Richard Kaplan, Media Matters President David Brock (who used to call himself a conservative), said he hoped the network would disclose Luntz's "partisan Republican ties and history of questionable scientific methodology."

Brock cited a number of examples, including Luntz's work on the 1994 Republican "Contract with America," pointing out that Luntz was reprimanded by the American Association for Public Opinion Research for refusing to disclose data on how he surmised that 60 percent of Americans supported the Contract. Brock also noted Luntz's published remarks counseling swing-state Republicans on what to say about Iraq and homeland security.

Looks like the letter had an impact. Although MSNBC did not respond to Brock, a spokeswoman for the network told HOH late Wednesday that the network has decided "not to go with Frank for the debate." In fact, MSNBC won't conduct polling at all now, she said. Brock was delighted to hear the news. "It is encouraging that MSNBC responded to criticism in a constructive way. Clearly they realized that employing a partisan pollster does not reflect well on them as a responsible media outlet."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniorPlankton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. To reply to your subject
LESS spinning tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. No spinning disguised as "focus group"
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. To be replaced by the Grover Norquist Diner Chats
Edited on Thu Sep-30-04 11:29 AM by dave29
where non-partisan Grover Norquist sits down with average Americans and chews some fat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wahoo!
I think I'll go to media matters and see if I can send Brock a thank-you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Send one to Kaplan, as well...
... letting him know that you appreciate fair reporting.

We're not looking for all-liberal, all-the-time... because we know that we can win a fair fight. We're just asking for a fact-based approach to journalism, calling politicians on deception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. "We're not looking for all-liberal, all-the-time...because we know that
we can win a fair fight. We're just asking for a fact-based approach to journalism, calling politicians on deception."

Excellently put, krkaufman! I think this is exactly what journalists need to hear from each of us, so they don't just write us all off as "a bunch of left-wing nuts" mass e-mailing them.

We just want truth in reporting!

-wildflower
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's the DU discussion from last night about Luntz getting canned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatlingforme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Brocks credibility was real low in my book. He was a real shit when
he smeared Anita Hill as he did when they went through the nomination of Clarence Thomas. Now he admits they were lies and changed his ways. He above anyone else knows how to bamboozle the public --- at least now he is taking what he knows and using it in a constuctive manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. But Frank is such a nice, pasty white feller...
Not like that scary tanned Kerry guy...

23.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I Like Frank Luntz's Hair... I'd Like To Know Where You Can Buy Something
Like That.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Same place he bought his canned sincerity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. The Jim Traficant Wig Emporium.
Edited on Thu Sep-30-04 12:07 PM by elperromagico
Duh. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. One of the worst rugs on tv
Say goodbye to the bad hair piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The WaPost reported he's still "looking" for a wife. 'Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC