|
Real Pollsters want to make sure the people they call are truly representative of the General population. It is NOT random in the sense they just pull a number, but set up in a structured way to make sure the poll results accurately reflect what the general population feels. In your case it looks like they wanted to either poll males 18-42 OR the person who called you needed a male 18-42 in your census track and economic background to make his "sample" reflective of the population as a whole.
Look at those two possibilities I lean to it being a poll of Males 18-42, young male urban professionals, the least likely to use TV. Some one wanted to see where males 18-42 get their news from and since you had no male sin your household they was no one for the poll takers to poll.
I doubt it is a poll that needed males, females are also needed in such polls but it is sometimes the situation that a poll taker just can NOT get enough people of one demographic (male or Female, While, Black, age group etc) in a set census track (The basis for any real polling). Real poll takers will call a house 2-3 times just to get to talk to the person who lives in that house for such people represent the people from their economic/race/age background AND picking another house/person may just invalidate the poll.
Professional poll takers want polls that mean something not an ego boost, thus real polls are done with scientific rigidity to be as accurate as possible.
Now, people have heard of "Push-polling" when someone says he is taking a poll but is really pushing his candidate, that is NOT a real poll but a worse type of poll is a poll set up to get a pre-determined results. Many of the polls being released in this elections are of this later type, it is NOT to see who is winning but to show that Bush is Winning (Even if he is losing). This type of "false-polling" is even more common than "Push-polling" for these "false-polls" are than cited by the Candidate and the Media as "proof" that a candidate (in this election Bush) as leading. Some people will vote for the person they think will win and if you can convince enough people to vote for you for you are going to win anyway, you can win a close race. Thus a lot of these "False-polls" are being cited to convince people by repetition that Bush will win and you should vote for him if you want to vote for the winner.
Just a comment on "Rea polls", "Push-polling" and "False Polls" so that people understand why some of these "polls" do not seem to add up.
|