This guy is as out of touch as the Lying Sock Puppet,completely indefensible.
http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/Politics/Rauch_on_Nethercutt.htmlNational Journal 08-12-2000
SOCIAL STUDIES: Is There An Excuse For George Nethercutt?
by Jonathan Rauch
<snip>
"Should I be
elected to serve more than two additional terms in the U.S. House of
Representatives following the 104th Congress, by this letter I hereby
resign and direct you to remove my name permanently from the roll of the
members." For years, his Web site declared: "Term limits was one
of the defining issues of my 1994 campaign."
That Nethercutt, by breaking his promise, has committed one of the most
brazen political betrayals of our time is too obvious to be interesting.
More interesting is the question: Is there a case for his
betrayal?
Nethercutt himself has offered all sorts of arguments. Some of them are
pathetic, as when he said (to The Washington Post) that he had
"blurted out" his promise in 1994. Others are irrelevant, as
when he told The American Spectator, "I feel I have to finish the
work I started." (He did not promise, in 1994, to stay until he felt
he was finished.) Some are crass, as when he told The NewsHour With Jim
Lehrer that in 1994, "I didn't realize I'd be in the majority. I
didn't realize I'd be on the Appropriations Committee. That means
something for our district-not for me, but for our district." (In
1994, he had said: "I understand the issue of pork, power, and
productivity. But the world didn't fall apart 30 years ago when Walt Horan
got defeated by a 35-year-old lawyer.") Still others are simply
weird. "I'm less enamored with the idea of term limitations, and I'm
the perfect example of why we don't need them," he told The Post. (I
leave it to you to work that one out.)
<snip>
What the hell is he talking about? So much for gibberish and term limits,huh?
Now about the troops George...This from the Seattle P.I.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/143771_nethercutt14.html<snip>
The story of what we've done in the postwar period is remarkable," Nethercutt, R-Wash., told an audience of 65 at a noon meeting at the University of Washington's Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs.
"It is a better and more important story than losing a couple of soldiers every day."
He added that he did not want any more soldiers to be killed.
<snip>
Ok,I'm nauseated...(tweek)