Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wesley Clark: Canada's Afghan mission 'noble', but needsmore than soldiers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:33 AM
Original message
Wesley Clark: Canada's Afghan mission 'noble', but needsmore than soldiers
Former U.S. general Wesley Clark says Afghanistan is a "noble mission" for Canada, but all countries need to do more to support the country's development, including a new approach to reconstruction.

"Can't we do more to provide the kind of economic, political and social development support that's required to help this mission move forward?" Gen. Clark told Embassy following a keynote speech at the Centre for International Governance Innovation annual conference in Waterloo on Sept. 15.

"It's a wonderful thing to provide your soldiers, but what are we going to do about crop substitution?" he added, using improvements in the agriculture sector as one example of what's needed. "You can't grow pears and peaches where you grow opium because you can't market them."

General Clark, who served as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe from 1997 to 2000 and challenged Senator John Kerry for the Democrats' presidential nomination in 2003, said a strong economic program in Afghanistan is a sign of strength.

http://www.embassymag.ca/html/index.php?display=story&full_path=/2006/september/20/wclark/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Our mission WAS noble when it was peacekeeping and reconstruction
and BEFORE it was changed to a combat mission making our soldiers replacement fodder so the US can continue to screw up Iraq.

General Clark is right,imo, when he says this:

"Can't we do more to provide the kind of economic, political and social development support that's required to help this mission move forward?" Gen. Clark told Embassy following a keynote speech at the Centre for International Governance Innovation annual conference in Waterloo on Sept. 15.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Never liked this phoney...
It's amazing how much support this ineffectual warmonger got among 'democrats' like Michael Moore...but then again, if you are for choice and think health care is a good idea, you are progressive down south. :eyes:



Dear Gen. Clark,

You were WRONG in December 2005 and your wrong now...show some humility and stop treating these kids, your soldiers, as cannonfodder.

We don't need a war criminal American general telling us what is 'noble' or advise us of the proper way to drink a cup of kool-aid.

I propose we "cut and run" now before more Canadians are sacrificed in a CIVIL war which doesn't affect us one way or another -- using fear to sell foreign policy is ALWAYS a bad idea that gets innocents on both sides killed by hack generals who operate under ideological partisan considerations where they believe two contradictory positions like: having a dialogue with iran and syria to disfuse one situation (pragmatism based on winnability), but deny this option in Afghanistan.

Why the discrepency? Is Karzai that important and vital to the Afghani people? Please...

According to the creaky racist logic of US politics, they are all terrorists out to get our freedom and SUVs and so talking is merely a position of weakness, appeasement, and capitulation, right?

You bought into both the bullshit of Serbia and Iraq and never mentioned 'diplomacy' once -- in fact you shamelessly pushed the democrat canard in Iraq suggesting that the problem was 'not enough troops' when you ran for the primary.

Yeah that's right Wes -- everything in Iraq would have worked out peachy keen if there were MORE US troops illegally occupying a defenseless country ground down by 13 years of sanctions. Instead of one Fallujah -- you could have ten. Instead of one Abu Grahib -- you could have 20. More troops = more opportunities to oppress.

Show humility and say you are wrong and stop fronting for your military contractor buddies

Fuck you,
MrPrax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC