Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British MP banned from Canada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 02:43 PM
Original message
British MP banned from Canada
OTTAWA — Immigration Minister Jason Kenney will not intervene in a decision to ban British anti-war MP George Galloway from Canada.

Mr. Galloway termed the decision “idiotic” after Citizenship and Immigration Canada deemed the outspoken politician inadmissible on security grounds.

Mr. Kenney's office noted Mr. Galloway has expressed sympathy for the Taliban cause in Afghanistan and provided financial support to the Palestinian group Hamas, listed in Canada as a terrorist organization.

Speaking in Calgary on Friday, Mr. Kenney said that while he has authority to overrule his officials, he will not provide special treatment to the 54-year-old Scottish MP.
...
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090320.wminister0320/BNStory/politics/home
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see, we are supposed to be in Afghanistan to uphold values like free speech...Harper continues to turn Canada into a laughing stock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just read that on the Google Canada front page. It really shook me.
What have we become when our government calls someone a terrorist basically because he is anti-war?

Someone who objects to the strong bullying the weak.

And when I read the comments following the various online reports it seems half of them support the ban.

This is some scary shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I'd assume funding Hamas was the larger problem.. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes. I see, though Galloway refutes that 'Funding Hamas' accusation in this interview.
Starts 2 minutes into the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAm7rfHKSyY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Other peacemakers the Harper government has banned.
In October 2007 US Peacemakers Medea Benjamin, co-founder of CodePink and retired Colonel Ann Wright were barred from speaking at a Toronto peace conference.

http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/03/20/and-the-award-for-quickest-opposition-response-to-the-galloway-ban-goes-to/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And he's a member of the British Parliament
Edited on Fri Mar-20-09 03:12 PM by daleo
So, our government is saying that the British government (our ally in Afghanistan) contains terrorists, and is therefore a terrorist government. Honestly, this is an insult to the British and to Canadians. Harper is becoming unhinged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Unhinged is right. And it makes him look so fearful.
Terrified of a democratically elected British politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. British MP vows legal action after being barred from Canada
In Winnipeg, Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff said he never agrees with Mr. Galloway, but that's not a reason for barring him from the country. However, he said, if security officials have found he's a threat, he should not be allowed in.

“If he's being barred on free-speech grounds, that's an outrage. You can come to Canada and talk rubbish all day long as far as I'm concerned. If there's a security threat, that's another matter, and I've heard no evidence yet that he presents a security threat. And of course if there is one, as a responsible public official I will accept what security services say on Mr. Galloway.”

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090320.wgalloway0320/BNStory/politics/home

Sad to see that comment from Iggy. It is a pretty encompassing statement. I watched George's rebuttal in the US to the smear tacticians.

Now Iggy. You have to start telling me why I should vote Liberal!

It seems that you are doing everything to convince the Conservatives to vote for you.
So go ahead. Tell me why I should vote Liberal. And don't give me a negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah, Iggy should just stand up for free speech
The idea of there being a security threat to Canada is preposterous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Inadmissible based on "security grounds," huh?
Obviously the Conservatives know something Gordon Brown and our Queen do not. So why, oh, why haven't the Conservatives alerted them?

Seriously, today, our leadership has made me just a little more embarrassed to be a Canadian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. Toronto Star:: "Silly ban on British MP"
Silly ban on British MP
Plumb foolish. That's how Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government looks, declaring gadfly British MP George Galloway inadmissible to Canada.

Galloway was about to kick off a Canada-U.S. speaking tour but was denied entry by immigration officials as a security threat. The radical, anti-war, Taliban-friendly MP has cheerfully delivered humanitarian aid to the Hamas regime in Gaza, which might be a problem here, because it is classified as a terrorist group. Yet he has no criminal record and has broken no laws here.

He may be an affront to Conservatives and others, but that doesn't mean he poses a threat to Canada. He should be granted entry to speak whatever sense, or nonsense, he wants.

We aren't afraid of free speech in this country. U.S. authorities haven't denied him entry there. In recent years, the Canadian government has blocked the likes of Bill Ayers, an American Vietnam-era radical, and American anti-war activists Medea Benjamin and Ann Wright. The Harper Conservatives make us all look like country bumpkins. People who don't share their views aren't all hideous threats to the nation.
http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/605917


Banning British MP a clumsy, dangerous move
Jason Kenney has gone over the edge. The increasingly erratic immigration minister made headlines last week when, in a fit of pique, he cut off funding to an Arab organization that helps newcomers learn English. Now, Kenney has banned British MP George Galloway from entering Canada, on the spurious grounds that he supports Middle East terrorism.

It's a clumsy move, designed presumably to bolster the Conservative government's support among voters who ardently back Israel.

But in a roundabout way it does illustrate how absurdly broad Canada's new anti-terror laws are and how dangerous they can be in the wrong hands.

Galloway's apparent crime was to deliver humanitarian aid last week to Gaza's Hamas government, which Canada deems a terrorist organization. But the 54-year-old Scottish MP's real sin was that he couldn't resist rubbing it in. Others have taken aid into Hamas-controlled Gaza, including a delegation of Canadians and Americans who crossed into the Palestinian territory on March 8.

more: http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/606073


Not-so-free speech

LAURA KAMINKER

March 21, 2009

Mississauga -- Does anyone really think that British MP George Galloway is a threat to Canada's security? It's obvious that Mr. Galloway is being refused entry into Canada because he is critical of Canadian foreign policy under the Harper government.

Immigration Minister Jason Kenney has described himself in recent interviews as a defender of free speech. If that is true, he should immediately rescind the ill-advised, politically motivated decision to bar Mr. Galloway from Canada.

If George W. Bush, a war maker, can come to Canada, surely a peace activist can, too.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090321.COLETTS21-2/TPStory/Comment


Not-so-free speech

REG WHITAKER

March 21, 2009

Immigration Minister Jason Kenney wants to return Canada to the days of the Cold War. The last time a British MP was barred from visiting Canada because of their political views was in the 1950s, when "communist sympathies" were cited (Canada Bans Outspoken British MP - online, March 20). Today, George Galloway is accused of sympathizing with the Taliban and offering support to Hamas.

This decision was taken on the same day that U.S. President Barack Obama extended the hand of friendship to Iran via a video message. Should Mr. Obama ever seek to revisit Canada in the future, Mr. Kenney will no doubt be quick to step in and bar him. After all, the Harper government has denounced Iran for supporting Hezbollah and Hamas, so anyone offering friendship to a terrorist-supporting regime must represent a security risk to Canada.

distinguished research professor emeritus, York University,
adjunct professor of political science,University of Victoria
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090321.COLETTS21-1/TPStory/Comment

Canada should let British MP speak
By Lorne Gunter, The Edmonton JournalMarch 22, 2009 3:02 AM

I don't like George Galloway. I don't like his politics. His tactics are too showy and deliberately designed to provoke authorities and offend ordinary people whose views are opposed to his own. He gives aid and comfort to terrorists and is not shy about supporting their causes.

Still, I would not bar him from Canada for a speaking tour he has planned later this month.

Galloway is an elected British MP. That doesn't excuse him if his purpose is to break Canada's anti-terror laws. But until he has broken them, until he has stood on a podium in this country and asked, directly, for donations to Hamas or Hezbollah or Islamic Jihad, we have no reason to bar him from entering the country.
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Canada+should+British+speak/1415830/story.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. What was Israel's role in implementing the ban on Galloway?
Probably more than has been acknowledged by Canadian media and politicians.


British MP George Galloway barred from Canada under the Canada Israel "Public Security" Agreement

by Michel Chossudovsky

British MP George Galloway was refused entry to Canada on the pretext that he supported Hamas, which is categorized by the Canadian government as a "terrorist organization."

Contrary to what has been reported in the media, this was not a unilateral decision by the government of Canada.

In all likelihood, the decision was taken in close consultation with Israel under the terms of a farreaching agreement on "public security" signed in Tel Aviv on March 23 2008. The "Declaration of Intent" establishes a framework of bilateral cooperation between Canada and Israel in the area of "Public Security". The agreement has not been the object of debate in the Canadian parliament, nor has it received media coverage.

Under the proposed agreement, the Deputy Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness of Canada is in liason with his Israeli counterpart the Director General of Public Security for the Government of the State of Israel. Together they chair a joint Management Committee.

The terms reference of the Canada-Israel "Declaration" are extremely broad. They include issues of immigration and ethnic profiling, the management of borders, intelligence and the exchange of information, emergency preparedness, correctional services, prisons, law enforcement and counter-terrorism. The agreement allows for officials from the State of Israel, to play a role in Canadian "public security" including border security and immigration.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20090326&articleId=12913

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC