Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Government wanted quick Afghan detainee transfers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 07:11 PM
Original message
Government wanted quick Afghan detainee transfers
Canada's top two commanders in Afghanistan in spring 2006 said the government pressured them to transfer detainees to Afghan authorities faster than they felt was appropriate, CBC News has learned.

Investigators for the military police complaints commission interviewed Brig.-Gen. David Fraser and Lt.- Col. Tom Putt, who both described the government as being obsessed with speed when it came to the transfer of Afghan detainees, according to transcripts of those interviews obtained by CBC News.

Commanders in Canada wanted detainees handed over within as few as 12 hours — faster, in most cases, than soldiers in the field could process them.

Fraser was in charge of Canadian troops in Afghanistan in 2006. He told investigators examining allegations of abuse of Afghan detainees that the moment a detainee was captured, he had to notify his boss in Ottawa, Lt.- Gen. Michel Gauthier.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/12/03/afghan-detainees003.html
Thursday, December 3, 2009 | 6:40 PM ET

Directly up the line! And who was at the top?

The organisation will start cracking.

After four years there are now many skeletons in the closets.

Start pulling them out and the rest will unfold.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting!
Lt.- Gen. Michel Gauthier's boss in 2006: Hillier the warmonger, surprise, surprise. The same Hillier who testified he knew NOTHING, NOTHING about any torture and that Colvin was lying.

The leaking is becoming more of a stream than a trickle and that's good!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't
Forget that Harper was at the top!

His top down control now brings it back to his lap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep, his obsessive micro-managing just might be coming back to...
bite him in the ass. If documents/testimony comes out proving McKay knew, which I have NO doubt he did, then it lands directly into Harper's lap. As it stands now, Harper can continue with the disingenuous lie he knew nothing but the facts coming out are definitely 'climbing the ladder' higher and higher up the chain of command.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep
About time things come home to roost.

Would expect to see Mulroney/McKay guys to start coming out of the shadows. And that fellow from Quebec.

Hope you are comfy for the next day or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. A former UK ambassador (speaking from experience) expresses support for Colvin,
Torturing Ordinary People

Obviously I feel a great deal of sympathy with Canadian diplomat Richard Colvin. Those of us who reveal connivance by our own governments in gross human rights abuse, find little protection from fleeting media support and interest.

One thing I would underline which Colvin said, as it mirrors precisely my own experience in Uzbekistan:

He said the vast majority of the prisoners were ordinary Afghans, many with no connection to the insurgency

. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5geW1uXt-wU7Ky8e7rW3U57whblQwD9C4VKVG0


That is the truth about the "War on Terror" torture industry which its proponents refuse to face. The overhwelming majority of those tortured have been innocent. Of course, after torture, they have all confessed their guilt....

The "ticking bomb" scenario is supposed to pose the classical justification of torture. It denies that any action is per se wrong, and posits that inflicting terrible pain on one person is justified if it prevents terrible pain to more numerous others. That is precisely the argument which was being put to me when I was officially informed of the new British government policy of using torture for intelligence:

http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC