Avaaz.org vs. Sun TV vs. Unwitting Hill Journalists: And now you know the rest of the story. (Maybe)
September 3, 2010 5:04 PM
You can catch up on the first installment of the ongoing saga of the Great Sun TV Petition Anti-Drive here, but for the link-averse, here's the abbreviated version: Yesterday evening, various -- Maclean's columnists Andrew Coyne and Paul Wells, the Globe and Mail's Stephen Wicary, and the your humble blogatrix, among others -- were somewhat nonplussed to receive autoreplies from Avaaz.org, thanking us for signed their recently-launched petition calling on the CRTC to "Stop Fox News North," despite the fact that none of us had actually done so.
A steady stream of puzzled and irate reactions -- tweeted and otherwise -- from other Hill journalists, as well as political bloggers from both the left and right side , and even a handful of card-carrying Conservative staffers, made it clear that we weren't the only ones whose identities had apparently been appropriated by suspect(s) unknown.
The punch line -- or so it seemed at the time -- came a few hours later, when Kory Teneycke -- the PM's former communications director, brought on board by Quebecor with great fanfare earlier this year for the express purpose of getting the very network targeted by Avaaz on the air -- revealed that he, too, had "apparently ... signed the Soros-Atwood petition against Sun TV News as well."
Fast forward, then, to this morning, when a Teneycke-penned op-ed appeared throughout the Sun chain denouncing Atwood -- who had publicly endorsed the petition earlier in the week -- for an "ignorant attack" that, in his view, "confirms just why Canadians need Sun TV News."
http://www.cbc.ca/politics/insidepolitics/2010/09/avaazorg-vs-sun-tv-vs-unwitting-hill-journalists-and-now-you-know-the-rest-of-the-story-maybe.htmlBragi had this item posted one day ago. Good find Bragi.