Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jim Jeffords

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
JoMama49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:16 PM
Original message
Jim Jeffords
Please don't forget to THANK Jim Jeffords for his strong statement supporting the GAO investigation, his appreciation for the importance of the work of Rep. Conyers, and for Sen. Boxer and Stephanie Tubbs-Jones. Since he is an independent (and I wish we had MANY MORE of them!), I believe he got overlooked in the list of Senators to thank.

His statement appears on the 7th page in the series of pages accessible at the link below, and I encourage you to read it. He takes our concerns seriously,and I appreciate that.

Kerry's statement is avaiable in the Record as well, and other Senators
who did not speak.
>
> Here is the link directly to the pages in the Congressional Record
> for January 6th, 2005.
>
> http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2005_record&page=S35&position=all


The part dealing with Ohio's electoral vote protest begins on page
> S41 and continues through S56. These are in Acrobat pdf format. I
> couldn't figure out how to put the pages together since the navigator
> only allows one page at a time, so I pasted them into a Word doc and
> will put it in the files section of this site.
>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beth in VT Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. He does need support, the Republicans have been hard on him.
He has been championing eleciton reform in the last session of Congress, introducing legislation proposing paper trail and national standard for provisional ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. In other times, people with the grace and intelligence --
-- of Jim Jeffords characterized the Republican Party.

Boy has that changed.

He's kind of in exile from his own party. There was a behind-the-scenes row with Dubya's people. Right afterward Jeffords left the GOP and became an independent.

Does anyone know if he is running for re-election, or if he plans to retire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Beth in VT Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He creamed the Dem who ran against him last time -
he is very popular here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You're right. I hope he prevails against the GOP --
-- challenge if there is one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beth in VT Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I don't think he has announced his plans but
I have not heard that he is planning to retire. He is extremely popular here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That's good. It's kind of encouraging when --
-- a senator is warmly supported because of his independence and integrity.

You folks keep up the good work up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jeffords Remarks 1/6/05
Mr. JEFFORDS. Mr. President, we are here today in this extraordinary session to discuss a challenge to Ohio’s electors.

It was gratifying to see the high level of interest in the election create such a large voter turnout. However, it was discouraging to hear of the problems that affected the election in many parts of the country, including Ohio.

Representative CONYERS, other House Democrats, and individuals across this country deserve our thanks for the important work they have done to document the issues that arose from the 2004 election.

I would also like to thank Senator BOXER and Representative TUBBS JONES for their diligence in bringing this issue to the forefront.

All voters deserve to get answers, and corrective actions, to the reported irregularities and flaws of the 2004 election.

As my colleagues may know, the Government Accountability Office, GAO, is currently conducting a comprehensive investigation of many of the issues raised in the 2004 election.

I am very supportive of this investigation, and believe that through a complete and full investigation by the GAO, answers to the questions raised regarding the 2004 election will be obtained.

The information the GAO obtains will allow the Congress to take appropriate action to address the problems uncovered.

At a minimum, there are two changes to our election system that should be implemented by the Congress: requiring a paper trail for electronic voting machines and creating a national standard for provisional ballots.

I will work with my colleagues in the Congress to enact these important reforms. We must work to maintain, and indeed improve, the confidence in and integrity of the election process.

I am under no illusion that the actions taken on this challenge will change the outcome of the election. Senator KERRY has conceded the election. The events of today will not change this result, and I fear they will only further polarize our political landscape.

The solutions to the irregularities of the election will not be found or enacted in this 2-hour process today. They will come from a complete investigation, like the on-going GAO one.

Because I believe that contesting the slate of Ohio electors is not the way to achieve the needed reforms of the election system, I will vote against this challenge today.

However, I want to put my colleagues on notice that I will be vigorously pursuing reforms of the election system to enact much needed improvements in the system.

We have to make sure our elections are a solid reflection of the voters’ intent. Given the resources of our great Nation, there is no reason why we should not be able to achieve this goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC