Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VOTER CONFIDENCE RESOLUTION (formerly No Confidence)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 03:59 AM
Original message
VOTER CONFIDENCE RESOLUTION (formerly No Confidence)
Take this to your City Council or Board of Supervisors or whatever is the lowest level locally elected body. Ask them to pass it.

http://guvwurld.blogspot.com/2005/04/voter-confidence-resolution.html

Voter Confidence Resolution

(v6.0, LAST UPDATED: 4/23/05 11pm)

Whereas an election is a competition for the privilege of representing the people; and

Whereas each voter is entitled to cast a single ballot to record his or her preferences for representation; and

Whereas the records of individual votes are the basis for counting and potentially re-counting a collective total and declaring a winner; and

Whereas an election's outcome is a matter of public record, based on a finite collection of immutable smaller records; and

Whereas a properly functioning election system should produce unanimous agreement about the results indicated by a fixed set of unchanging records; and

Whereas recent U.S. federal elections have been conducted under conditions that have not produced unanimous agreement about the outcome; and

Whereas future U.S. federal elections cannot possibly produce unanimous agreement as long as any condition permits an inconclusive count or re-count of votes; and

Whereas inconclusive counts and re-counts have occurred during recent U.S. federal elections due in part to electronic voting devices that do not produce a paper record of votes to be re-counted if necessary; and

Whereas inconclusive results have also been caused by election machines losing data, producing negative vote totals, showing more votes than there are registered voters, and persistently and automatically swapping a voter's vote from his or her chosen candidate to an opponent; and

Whereas inconclusive results make it impossible to measure the will of the people in their preferences for representation; and

Whereas the Declaration of Independence refers to the Consent of the Governed as the self-evident truth from which Government derives "just Power";

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Because inconclusive results, by definition, mean that the true outcome of an election cannot be known, there is no basis for confidence in the results reported from U.S. federal elections; and

Be it also resolved:

Ensuring conclusive results is only one necessary step toward creating a new basis for voter confidence in U.S. federal elections. Additional reforms that would take further steps toward building voter confidence include:
1) voting processes owned and operated entirely in the public domain, and
2) clean money laws to keep all corporate funds out of campaign financing, and
3) a voter verifiable paper ballot for every vote cast and additional uniform standards determined by a non-partisan nationally recognized commission
4) declaring election day a national holiday
5) counting all votes publicly and locally in the presence of citizen witnesses and credentialed members of the media, and
6) equal time provisions to be observed by the media along with a measurable increase in local, public control of the airwaves, and
7) presidential debates containing a minimum of three candidates, run by a non-partisan commission comprised of representatives of publicly owned media outlets, and
8) instant runoff voting (see H.R. 5293) and proportional representation to replace the winner-take-all system for federal elections;
Be it further resolved:

When elections are conducted under conditions that prevent conclusive outcomes, the Consent of the Governed is not being sought. Absent this self-evident source of legitimacy, such Consent is not to be assumed or taken for granted.

***
The permalink for the Voter Confidence Resolution is:
http://guvwurld.blogspot.com/2005/04/voter-confidence-resolution.html

**
An archive of related prior works can be found HERE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Paul Dlugokencky Donating Member (409 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. This should be on the Greatest Page
Thank you for posting this, GuvWurld.

This is a call to action for everyone! This country is truly lost without fair, verifiable elections.



http://www.cafepress.com/kickindemocrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is really wonderful!!!
Nominated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dxstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. FANTASTIC POST!
Well done, Guv! Kicked and nominated!
This is so important... if we don't force real changes soon, we wil continue to get questionable representation at best:



DXS
"I LOVE horror movies, man... I just don't want to LIVE in one."
http://presidentevilonline.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Next Steps
Thanks for the support everybody. This is the first time I've made Greatest.

There is important discussion that should surround this resolution and I suppose it is up to me to start it. The Arcata, CA City Council has agreed to give this resolution a public hearing, tentatively on June 15. Going to the lowest available level of government is what I'm recommending in all communities. We're seeking the most accessible, often the most accountable.

The resolution can spread as fast or faster than the 300+ anti-Patriot act resolutions (that still haven't restored our rights). The lesson I draw is that we need to ensure cumulative impact. Five communities with resolutions means more than one and fifty means more than five. We use this frame: has the Consent of the Governed been withdrawn, YET?

We've already established in the resolution that the Consent is not being sought. Withdrawing it should hardly stretch the imagination. When the first resolution passes nobody will really declare or determine that the Consent of the Governed has been withdrawn. But if our frame question is asked as each new resolution passes, at some point the answer will switch from NO to YES, the Consent of the Governed *has* been withdrawn.

Many are familiar with Malcolm Gladwell's book The Tipping Point. It is worth noting the subtitle: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Think cumulative impact. A straw. A camel's back.

I've written a lot about this over the past year in the GuvWurld blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. Excellent. Passed it on! mt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sorry, but...
An election is a survey, not a contest or competition.

And this is far more than a semantic distinction. This general notion of elections as contests is at the core of much of our inability to secure the level of confidence that is our ultimate goal.

Just like the census, an election tries to measure an objective reality: the will of the electorate. There's no reason why we couldn't conduct them in the same way, with bonded agents going door-to-door collecting private ballots from voters.

The point(of view) being made(changed) is that an election is about the voters (not votes - ever). Candidates, campaigns, Parties, officials, equipment manufacturers, are all nearly-irrelevant.

There is only one principle/interested-party/owner and that is the electorate as a whole.

We need to insert "survey not a contest" as a propaganda meme into all election discussion. It changes minds. Try it, you'll see.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Interesting. What other surveys have winners?
I'm all for fine tuning the resolution in every community so that the wording reflects whatever is most comfortable on the local level. Just don't lose sight of the broader strategy and goals which can be accomplished regardless of whether it is called a contest, competition or survey. That is, the resolution is a template and whether you consider the distinction semantic or fundamental, minor or major, it should not skew the bigger picture. Show it around in your town, take it to your City Council, make it your own. But please, let's take a "yes, and" approach here rather than "sorry, but." Let's try to come at this from the angle "what would be better?" I understand your view is that survey would be better than competition. That is valid and legitimate. Use it to build this up and spread it, not tear it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. With surveys, everyone wins.
Everyone gets the same, accurate measure of reality.

Again, the goal of a free and fair election.

As for the rest, I've said my piece. Make of it what you will.

--

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. This resolution is now the top item on David Cobb's site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Cobb archive link for Voter Confidence Resolution (and KICK)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
17. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. Like Wiley50, why am I kicking my own thread?
Why did people put this on the Greatest page and then say nothing about it?

Why do people say they want to be involved, but they don't know what to do, when a simple common sense statement has been prepared for them to advocate?

These are rhetorical questions - they don't require answers. The Voter Confidence Resolution simply deserves support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
23. KICK (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. UPDATED: Voter Confidence Resolution v6.1
Voter Confidence Resolution
(v6.1, LAST UPDATED: 5/3/05 1am)

Whereas an election is a competition for the privilege of representing the people; and

Whereas each voter is entitled to cast a single ballot to record his or her preferences for representation; and

Whereas the records of individual votes are the basis for counting and potentially re-counting a collective total and declaring a winner; and

Whereas an election's outcome is a matter of public record, based on a finite collection of immutable smaller records; and

Whereas a properly functioning election system should produce unanimous agreement about the results indicated by a fixed set of unchanging records; and

Whereas recent U.S. federal elections have been conducted under conditions that have not produced unanimous agreement about the outcome; and

Whereas future U.S. federal elections cannot possibly produce unanimous agreement as long as any condition permits an inconclusive count or re-count of votes; and

Whereas inconclusive counts and re-counts have occurred during recent U.S. federal elections due in part to electronic voting devices that do not produce a paper record of votes to be re-counted if necessary; and

Whereas inconclusive results have also been caused by election machines losing data, producing negative vote totals, showing more votes than there are registered voters, and persistently and automatically swapping a voter's vote from his or her chosen candidate to an opponent; and

Whereas inconclusive results make it impossible to measure the will of the people in their preferences for representation; and

Whereas the Declaration of Independence refers to the Consent of the Governed as the self-evident truth from which Government derives "just Power";

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Because inconclusive results, by definition, mean that the true outcome of an election cannot be known, there is no basis for confidence in the results reported from U.S. federal elections; and

Be it also resolved:

The following is a comprehensive election reform platform likely to ensure conclusive election results and create a basis for confidence in U.S. federal elections:
1) voting processes owned and operated entirely in the public domain, and
2) clean money laws to keep all corporate funds out of campaign financing, and
3) a voter verifiable paper ballot for every vote cast and additional uniform standards determined by a non-partisan nationally recognized commission, and
4) declaring election day a national holiday, and
5) counting all votes publicly and locally in the presence of citizen witnesses and
credentialed members of the media, and
6) equal time provisions to be observed by the media along with a measurable increase in local, public control of the airwaves, and
7) presidential debates containing a minimum of three candidates, run by a non-partisan commission comprised of representatives of publicly owned media outlets, and
8) preferential voting and proportional representation to replace the winner-take-all system for federal elections;
Be it further resolved:

When elections are conducted under conditions that prevent conclusive outcomes, the Consent of the Governed is not being sought. Absent this self-evident source of legitimacy, such Consent is not to be assumed or taken for granted.

***
The permalink for the Voter Confidence Resolution is:
http://guvwurld.blogspot.com/2005/04/voter-confidence-resolution.html

**
An archive of related prior works can be found HERE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuvWurld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kick (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC