Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Commentary: Hanging chads were better than this

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 04:01 PM
Original message
Commentary: Hanging chads were better than this




California Focus By
Tom Elias

There's no longer any doubt about it: Hanging chads were far, far better than what could ensue if California Secretary of State Bruce McPherson this spring certifies the two most common brands of electronic voting machines for use in this year's elections and many more to come.

snip.... Also known is that O'Dell resigned from Diebold in December, just days before a securities fraud action in an Ohio federal court charged that the company's "false and misleading statements served to conceal the dimensions and scope of internal problems at the company impacting product quality…"

Will McPherson consider all these factors in his now-delayed decision on whether Diebold machines can be used in California? When queried, he did not respond.

And why did he delay for six weeks disclosing there were also problems with ES&S machines in the November special election? No answer to that one, either.



http://www.ridgecrestca.com/articles/2006/01/06/news/columnists/colo01.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes -- chads --hmm the good old days-- LOL K n R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. And another kick here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Diebold.....it's da machines, it's da machines...
They need to go far away from all voting areas, along with ESS, Sequoia and the other filters and leeches on our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. come on one more recommendation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O.M.B.inOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-09-06 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. self-delete
Edited on Mon Jan-09-06 03:10 AM by O.M.B.inOhio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Didn't get the message PM me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. I keep wondering if anyone else is going to file a 19202 Request to test
these machines. THAT is the most helpful way to make machine problems public, as we saw in Leon County.

McPherson is required by state law to comply with those requests.
Right now he's in violation of BBV.org's request from last June -- ie: HE'S BREAKING THE LAW!

If these tests were conducted, the vote-stealing devices' problems would become public knowledge, then he couldn't certify them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC