Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EAC scandal grows--Sarasota's "undervote" voting machine models certified by banned lab, Ciber,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 09:24 PM
Original message
EAC scandal grows--Sarasota's "undervote" voting machine models certified by banned lab, Ciber,
Edited on Mon Jan-15-07 09:25 PM by kster
before untested upgrades.



by Michael Richardson

Ciber, Inc. is the nation's largest independent testing authority of electronic voting machines certifying machines used by 68.5% of registered voters in 2006. However, last year the Election Assistance Commission secretly pulled Ciber's interim accreditation for failure to perform quality assurance testing and documentation of security testing.

Included in the long list of improperly tested or untested electronic voting machine models were the ES&S machines used in Sarasota, Florida, where a staggering 18,000 votes in a Congressional race were reported as "undervotes". Florida, which does not require federal certification, boasts, "Florida's voting systems standards and certification program are recognized as the most stringent in the nation."

Because Florida has its own certification program and because the Sarasota voting machines had upgrades that apparently lack federal approval, Ciber did not have the last word on the accuracy of the "undervote" machines.

However, in a March 3, 2006 "technical advisory" to county election officials Dawn Roberts, Director of Elections, relied on "Ciber Laboratory's Source Code Review and Functional Testing reports" to warn against "potential system vulnerabilities".

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_michael__070115_eac_scandal_grows__s.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. One would think, wouldn't one
Edited on Mon Jan-15-07 10:53 PM by BeFree
... that a bunch of dishonest people are in control of the voting machines: from the watchers of the undertakers to the undertakers themselves. All the way down the line one could surmise that the whole shebang is crooked, couldn't one?

And I've heard that the law, as simple as it was, was simply violated up one side and down the other, and we still have some people trying to tell us that it wasn't. Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galloglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. K'n'R
Good catch, Kster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! I KNEW IT!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: ::rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: ::rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I called this one! I did! I KNEW IT! THAT's where they "tested" FL-13!!!!

We ought to have a smilie for CROWING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R.(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. What other voting machines were okayed by Ciber?
Does anyone have the list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Reports say Ciber "only" tests software
ONLY?

Also, this article points out that Ciber is a major contributor to Republican candidates. It also points out that the CEO, Bobby Stevenson, sold 25,000 share of Ciber stock December 26..."insider trading" anyone?

http://www.correntewire.com/times_fails_to_mention_banned_voting_machine_tester_ciber_inc_is_republican_contributor

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC