Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wall Street Buys Ohio Voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:29 PM
Original message
Wall Street Buys Ohio Voters
Columbus, Ohio (PRWEB) March 19, 2008 -- The Ohio Election Justice Campaign (OEJC) announces its pension divestment plan from United Technologies Corporation (UTX), a military-industrial conglomerate.

In a report published Monday, March 17, Financial Trader forecast that the proposed UTX takeover of Diebold (DBD), one of the largest makers of voting machines, is likely to be successful, especially as "UTX derives roughly 15% of its revenue from Civilian Security Systems." http://www.financialtrader.com/DBD_UTX_Merge_US_Votes_For_Profit.html

UTX also includes engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney, which has 11,000 military engines in service with 27 armed forces worldwide, and Sikorsky, manufacturer of the Black Hawk Helicopter.

According to Paddy Shaffer, Director, OEJC, "It is time that Americans took control of their future. UTX + DBD = Gestapo Elections with your money."

Diebold (DBD), based in Canton, OH, produces the GEMS tabulator system, used across the nation to count votes, including in Ohio, Texas, California, Florida, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Wisconsin, Kentucky, and Virginia. All of these states have pension fund investment in UTX. Diebold's GEMS tabulator system was a center of controversy during the 2004 Ohio election in Lucas County because of alleged discrepancies between the computer vote count and the exit poll as well as irregularities during the recount, including reprogramming of the tabulators.

more here

http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/20080319/bs_prweb/prweb781284_2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. There is a HUGE conflict of interest here.
It suprises me that it is even legal to privatize voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC