Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My Conclusion: Jesus Christ was an Anti-Establishment Revolutionary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
Homer12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:15 PM
Original message
My Conclusion: Jesus Christ was an Anti-Establishment Revolutionary
Edited on Sun Apr-08-07 06:16 PM by Homer12
Who was against the power of Rome and the established Jewish Clergy.

In the end these were his most powerful attributes, trying to change a system of corruption and privledge.

He was not the son of god, a demi-god, or a deity, He was a man with a message.

The Irony is Organized Religion took his message and twisted it so now they have power over other people, and even worse people give up the free will to these organized religions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why do you think he was killed?!
Jesus was completely and totally a revolutionary.

"What you do to the least among you, is also done to me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. So I take it you don't believe in the Easter Zombie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Mmm. love the Easter Zombie...

bringing baskets of fresh brains...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. If Jesus walk the streets of America today HomeLand Security would
tag him as a terrorist and send him to to a secret prison to torture him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Woody Guthrie said that Jesus was the first socialist outlaw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateModerate Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. You should probably drop the 'Christ' then
Edited on Sun Apr-08-07 06:18 PM by BlueStateModerate
Seeing as it isn't a surname. ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. What did he say about Rome? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arwennick Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. that they smell like olives
BWAHAHAHA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Mainly, give Caesar's unto Caesar and God's unto Gods
Edited on Sun Apr-08-07 06:48 PM by Kagemusha
in other words, pay your taxes and praise the Lord.

Edit: Which was, and remains, inherently offensive to Jews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NormanYorkstein Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. how is that "inherently offensive to Jews"?
Jews pay taxes too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Because a Messiah is supposed to bring war, not peace
So Jesus' message of peace was inherently insulting. If Jesus had liberated Palestine from the Romans, they might've accepted him. Having the temerity to die crucified as a common criminal having not liberated a single Jew from bondage is not something they have ever forgiven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. the guys who ran the temple were corrupt-money changers-
and were sharing the profits with the romans. they also claimed that jesus was a "king" thus pissing off the romans..jesus never declared he was a "king"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. No, you don't understand the context.
Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's means, if Caesar printed
the money, then don't withold taxes from Caesar's hands.
Give it back to him. You're not supposed to value Caesar's money.

As for what is God's -- what isn't God's? The Romans interpreted
this phrase as a tax revolt. The Money-changers at the time were
setting up a "bourse" in the Temple where you could pay temple tax
with Roman denarii by changing it at the temple. Jesus was saying
don't fund the temple with Roman dollars. Doing so was supposed
to be against Temple law, not to mention Jewish sovereignty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. My Conclusion: Jesus was the Gingerbread Man.
Look at the evidence:

All those signs everywhere today saying, "He is Risen."

Initally he decends to a very hot place, comes out of that and "disappears". "Run, run, run, as fast as you can. You can't catch me, I'm the Messiah." or something like that.

And that whole body of Christ thing...I mean, nobody wants to eat a dead guy...but a Gingerbread Man? Count me in!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Har, har! But where does fish eating figure in?
There are a number of strange and contradictory fetishes that the Gingerbread Man story doesn't quite cover.

Drink blood, eat flesh on Sat, Sun, Mon, Tues, Wed, and Thurs, but don't eat meat on Fri. Eat fish. Receive the 'body of Christ' on your tongue, but your hands cannot touch it. Only the priest's hands. Total "clean" fetish. Him swishing around up there in his lace and gold-threaded Byzantine dress. Women after childbirth can't go near it, until they are "purified." A lot of stuff going on here.

Hansel and Gretel comes to mind, for some reason. Children who lose their way, straying into the clutches of the Old Witch in the forest, and getting fattened up to be roasted in the oven, having left a trail of bread crumbs behind them, to find their way home.

The Church "faithful" are the children. Its rejection of the Goddess is the forest. The Old Witch is the third aspect of the Triple Goddess (virgin, mother and crone), who receives the human body back into the earth for "rest" (the earth, the cauldron of natural ferment out of which life emerges). The danger to the children is not the Old Witch--a natural phenomenon of return--but rather the Church itself, which projects a vision of hellfire as punishment for those who "sin" (stray off the path; disobey the Church and its often insane and fetishistic dictates). The "bread crumbs" are the path back to Enlightenment that has been obscured by powermongers and fascists. Balance, wholeness, male and female principles in harmony.

So, we need a new story: The Gingerbread Woman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. You got it! The remarkable thing is that his message still comes through with
Edited on Sun Apr-08-07 06:53 PM by Peace Patriot
crystal clarity after about 1,500 years of the opposite message getting promulgated by a hugely errant church, including numerous editings, rewrites, and other tamperings with the stories of the New Testament, most of which occurred in the 5th century AD, when the "official" gospels were selected and all the others--including several that were older (closer to Jesus' time) than the official ones--got burned, suppressed, thrown out. That was the period in which the christian movement was cemented with state power, to be enforced by violence.

It's like a beacon shining through the ages of western civilization: The kingdom is within you. Love thy neighbor as thyself. Communal. Egalitarian. Y'all come. Peace be with you, my peace I give unto you.

For all the effort that went into killing this revolutionary idea, they couldn't.

Thomas Jefferson picked up on this. He wrote a book called "Jefferson's Bible," in which he attempted to extract the essential revolutionary message of love from all the editings, rewrites and other tamperings. It's a fascinating work.

I have always suspected the line "Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my church" as an interpolation from the 5th century. It is like nothing else Jesus ever said. He was anti-institutional, and clearly would have been appalled by the monstrosity that the church became--with its repression of women, witch-burnings, inquisitions, "baptism by the sword," vast rich properties, alliance with fascists, and bloody Crusades.

And yet, is this horrid institution nevertheless an inadvertent carrier of an ancient philosophy that can save the human race from self-immolation? Perhaps. In truth, they COULD NOT extinguish that philosophy. It's there, in the New Testament. It shines through. And would we be aware of it, had the institutional church not carried its texts forward--or rather, had good and intelligent individuals within the institution not preserved its essence? It's possible that Jesus' message--which bears great resemblance to Buddha's--is so essentially a part of human evolution that it would recur no matter what was done to stamp it out. But I do like the ironies of history--that perhaps the church did something beneficial, in the course of its violation of all christian principles for 1,500 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. So...what is the basis of this conclusion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Jesus was very clearly counter culture
But what he railed most against, when he railed, was the politicization of the religious culture. He was a reverant Jew, but he opposed the pharisees and the Sadduceees and even the Chief Priese becuse of their neglect of the Law and the benign neglect of the congregation of Isreale.


But it should also be understood that his 'ministry was far more than mereley launching the occasional attack ont the religious leadership.

I think it is somewhat incongruiys to deal with Jesus on the political level but totally avoud the miracles and the healings and what he said baout the realtion ship between God and Man, The Pharisees were so upest with him and wanted him punished because he challenged their religios authority by firest and foremost saying what they considered to be blasphemous AND healing the sick and toucvhing the unclesn on the Sabbath.

It was not theat he was a hearler and performaed miracles but that he was doing these thing on the Sabbath. It was not simply that he challenged their political authority, but that he stood up in the middle of the entire congreagtion of Isreal in the inner court of the temple at theheight of the Feat of Tabernacles and said "I am the Light of the World"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. he was a prophet
as was many before him and after after him. who is to say that gandhi,king,or mandela won`t be looked on as a prophet in a hundred or more years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Almost right....
He was the one of the first liberals. He spoke of love and compassion and equality.

I differ though in that I believe He was the Son of God.

He spoke against the oppressors and the appeasers and was crucified for it.

How fucked up are we then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. Thrown in the DU's religion ghetto again
I guess I underestand the reason's why. I just wish they would treat all OPs that focus on religion )pro or con) the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Hey, the R/T forum is a happening place.
Just imagine if they tossed into the one of the religion groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-08-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. Rome was a slave state and opposition to slavery was integral to Jewish history
so no big surprise that Rome's invasion and conquest of Palastine was opposed.

Speaking of zombies, what was on the sponge of bitter bile, tetradoxin? Escaping a Roman death sentence was a slick trick. Heroic even!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MistressOverdone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-09-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. I think so
In a lifetime of trying to follow his example, I am hitting about the 15 percent mark now. Big improvement on the '80's, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC