Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 things the Belief Blog learned in its first year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 12:42 AM
Original message
10 things the Belief Blog learned in its first year
There is an explanation for each of the 10 items, but I am just going to post the list with a link to the explanations.

By Dan Gilgoff, CNN.com Religion Editor

1. Every big news story has a faith angle.
2. Atheists are the most fervent commenters on matters religious.
3. People are still intensely curious about the Bible, its meaning and its origins.
4. Most Americans are religiously illiterate.
5. It's impossible to understand much of the news without knowing something about religion.
6. Regardless of where they fit on the spectrum, people want others to understand what they believe.
7. Americans still have an uneasy relationship with Islam.
8. God may not prevent natural disasters, but religion is always a big part of the response.
9. Apocalyptic movements come and go.
10. Most Americans don't know that President Barack Obama is a Christian.

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/06/08/10-things-the-belief-blog-learned-in-its-first-year/

I love #2.

If you click on the link, you will see additional info on each listed item.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Number one especially. Every major media story about local tragedy has a faith based angle.
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 01:26 AM by pa28
Every time there is disaster with a human toll the media formula requires note of some isolated "miracle" or at least commentary by a survivor who references god. Never fails.

Also ties into #8 "God may not prevent natural disasters, but religion is always a big part of the response."

Good post.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dimbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Definitely buy into #5.
The Romans used to say "every learned man is a theologian." Nowadays we would make that every learned person. You can't ignore such a potent force. Or you do so at your peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. 4. Most Americans are religiously illiterate.
Most Americans think everyone else is religiously illiterate (but not them.)

4. Most Americans are religiously illiterate.
That's the one I like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. #3
People have been taught many untruths about the Bible from their priests and ministers, their parents, and people on television. The Bible is mysterious to most of them and they desire to understand more about it. It would be wonderful if more people had basic knowledge about the Bible so that they might better understand its place in modern society and the importance it should have in their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ever taken a real course in the bible?
I don't mean theology. I mean history, the pre-exile period, the post-exile period, the twelve tribes of israel, the textual sources J,E,D and P??

The fact that the council of Nicaea was a case of Constantine wanting to unify his empire under one single religion, while a committee threw in and threw out what canonical in the Bible? Doctrines such as the Trinity that were added later? They wanted to control the people, especially the women and the slaves.

The words they changed, the stuff they didn't like, the stuff that was mistranslated, after going through several languages? Clue: young woman does not equal virgin.

Xtianity is a syncretic religion, meaning it was put together from older pagan sources, and has NOTHING original in it theologically. The basic rules of morality can be found in any proper religion. We do not know if Jesus really existed as a person. The Gospels were all written at least fifty or more years after the alleged life of Jesus. There is no independent government record that Jesus actually existed. Jesus is exactly the same god as many others who were born of a virgin on December 25th, wise men came to his birth and supernovas appeared in the sky to announce his birth: Mithra, Apollo and Osiris, among many others.

There is no morality from this nomadic, bronze-age book that is logical or any better than morality from any other book one could find on the subject. These people knew nothing of education or science. If you read the bible you will learn that Pi is 3, the sun goes around the earth and the moon shines by its own light. And that all humanity came from one couple formed by God, and all surviving species of animals were loaded on an ark by Noah. and that earth is no more than 6,000 years old.

All those statements have been proven false, without a doubt, by science.

There are about five pages of good morality in that book. The rest of it is inaccurate history, village gossip and fairy tales.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. But don't you know?
The Bible is full of genuine history that is as true as we can know because the idea of accurately recording history is a modern idea.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, I attended a private college run by Baptists.
We were required to take one course on the Old Testament and one on the New Testament. The Southern Baptist Convention was going through a change at the time as right wingers began to take over at the more moderate colleges and seminaries. The faculty was generally more moderate than the administration or even the student body.

I had been taught in church that the Bible was the inspired word of God. I had an idea that it wasn't true, but I had no other information to back that up. In those Bible classes, I learned about the inconsistencies, impossibilities and the just plain weirdness of the Bible. If I hadn't been required to take those courses, at a Baptist school no less, I might still have some of the crazy beliefs I was brought up with.

I believe that there are a lot of people who want to know more about the Bible's origins and teachings. I wish there was a way to get that information to people without preaching to them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Posts like yours are invariably amusing.
You reject the historical material in the Bible while uncritically swallowing the Zeiegeist/Murdock woo-woo hook, line and sinker. Just for an example, Mithras was born from a rock, not a virgin; Apollo's mother was seduced by Zeus--goodby virginity!--and Osiris, along with Isis, Nephtys and Set were the children of Geb (Erth) and Nut (Sky), old married folks, and presumably not celibate. Furthermore, the three you mentioned are gods of very different things. Mithras began as a god of cattle and contracts, then morphed into the soldier's god; Apollo was a sun god,as well as sponsor of fine arts and music; and Osiris was a vegetation deity and lord of the underworld. These deities are hardly the "same as each other," let alone Jesus.

And I hate to break it to you, but bronze-age nomads didn't write books. The first version of the OT was produced in the very settled city of Jerusalem by priests under the sponsorsip of king Josiah in the 7th centery BCE--some 4 centuries after the end of the bronze age. They may have had a shaky grasp of certain physical phenomena, but so did the rest of the ancient world. Decimal fractions were several centuries in the future at the time the OT was written, yet Israelite artisans seemed to have sufficient practical grasp of the concept of pi to produce round vessesls.

Oh--and the "young woman does not equal virgin" question has nothing to do with Constantine and everything to do with how the English language has changed between the early 17th and later centuries. "Virgin" meant "unmarried' during king James/Shakespeare's time; "maiden' meant what we mean by "virgin."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Because Isaiah was originally written in English in the 17th century?
And here I had always thought it was written centuries before the King's English even existed.

BTW, you don't have to understand pi to make a round vessel. Ever hear of a potter's wheel? You know, that 6-7000 year-old piece of technology that let's you form a round vessel out of a lump of clay. Hell, you don't even need to have a concept of what a diameter or circumference are to make something round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'll bet you thought that remark really, really was clever.
Edited on Wed Jul-20-11 01:12 PM by okasha
But as usual, you're wrong. "Virgin" is how King James' team translated the Hebrew word for "young woman." I. e., they used the perfectly correct term in their contemporary usage.

i have a friend who's a world-famous ceramicist. I'll ask him about the possibility of creating a copper vessel several feet across on a potter's wheel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I see that when confronted, you prefer to move the goalposts.
"yet Israelite artisans seemed to have sufficient practical grasp of the concept of pi to produce round vessesls."

Knowledge of pi, let alone understanding of any relation between circumference to diameter is unnecessary knowledge for producing "round vessels." I give the example of a round ceramic from a lump of clay by use of a potter's wheel and you immediately move the goalpost.

So, we've moved from a round vessel to a large copper vessel. Should I explain how such a thing can be made without an understanding of pi? I'm really curious where the next location of the goalposts will be, so I think I'll do so.

There's something known as casting in which a hollow form is filled with a molten metal. The metal cools and the form is removed, and what do you know! You can have a "copper vessel several feet across" without any clue as to the relation between circumference and diameter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The canard that pi=3
comes from a passage in which a large copper "sea"--"30 cubits in circumference and 10 in diameter" is cast by Hiram of Tyre for Solomon's Temple. So, no, the goalposts are exactly where they were from the begninning. If you're saying, as you seem to be, that such a vessel could be cast without any knowledge of pi--that the 10 cubits in diameter and 30 in circumference are rough ex-post facto dmensions of a round object made from a mold perhaps measured off with a cord fsstened at the center--then we are not in disagreement. On the other hand, if you want to insist that the description of this object indicates that the Israelites had no concept of pi, when they obviously did have a fair approximation of it--that's another matter entirely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. And now you change the argument entirely while asserting its constancy.
First you claim that knowledge of pi is required to make round vessels.

After being confronted with an example of how a round vessel can be made in complete ignorance of pi, you changed "round vessels" to "a copper vessel several feet across."

Now after being shown how "a copper vessel several feet across" can be made in total ignorance of pi, you decide to argue the validity of 2 Chronicles and say THAT'S been the argument all along.

BTW: The "sea" in question was bronze, not copper (if it even existed at all).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Well played.
Though I too am fascinated by the extra-mobile goalposts with this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Lame.
It's not my fault you didn't realize the discussion had to do with the temple vessel all along. And you're right of course on one point; it is described as bronze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Oh please, all these gods had similar characteristics. Read Joseph Campbell.
http://www.websitesonadime.com/ffwic/mithra.htm

These many volumes contained much interesting information that was damaging to Christianity, such as the important correspondences between the "lives" of Mithra and Jesus, as well as identical symbols such as the cross, and rites such as baptism and the eucharist. In fact, Mithraism was so similar to Christianity that it gave fits to the early Church fathers, as it does to this day to apologists, who attempt both to deny the similarities and yet to claim that these (non-existent) correspondences were plagiarized by Mithraism from Christianity. There are several problems with this argument, the first of which is that the god Mithra was revered for centuries prior to the Christian era.

Furthermore, by the time the Christian hierarchy prevailed in Rome, Mithra had already been the official cult, with pope, bishops, etc., and its doctrines were well established and widespread, reflecting antiquity. Mithraic remains on Vatican Hill are found underneath the later Christian edifices, which proves the Mithra cult was there first. In fact, while Mithraic ruins from the first and second centuries are abundant throughout the Roman Empire, "The earliest church remains, four in Dura-Europos, date only from around 230 CE."

From The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia, vol. XII:

"The birth of Mithra and of Christ were celebrated on the same day; tradition placed the birth of both in a cave; both regarded Sunday as sacred; in both the central figure was a mediator (mesim) who was one of a triad or trinity; in both there was a sacrifice for the benefit of the race, and the purifying power of blood from the sacrifice was, though in different ways, a prime motive; regeneration or the second birth was a fundamental tenet in both; the conception of the relationship of the worshipers to each other was the same -- they were all brothers; both had sacraments, which baptism and a common meal of bread and the cup were included; both had mysteries from which the lower orders of initiates were excluded; ascetic ideals were common to both; the ideas of man, the soul and its immortality, heaven and hell, the resurrection of the dead, judgment after death, the final conflagration by which the world is to be consumed, the final conquest of evil, were quite similar"

Christian apologist Sir Weigall outlines some of the correspondences with Christianity:

"Mithra appears to have lived an incarnate life on earth, and suffered death for the good of mankind, an image symbolizing his resurrection being employed in his ceremonies. Tarsus, home of St. Paul, was one of the great centers of his worship, being the chief city of the Cilicians; and…there is a decided tinge of Mithraism in the Epistles and Gospels. Thus the designations of our Lord as the Dayspring from on High, the Light, the Sun of Righteousness, and similar expressions, are borrowed from or related to Mithraic phraseology…. The words of St. Paul, "They drank of that spiritual rock…and that rock was Christ" are borrowed from the Mithraic sculptures…"

Mithraic art also was utilized within Christianity: One example is Mithra "shooting at the rock," from which flowed water, a scene that became "Moses smiting the rock" in Christian iconography. Mithra as Helios rising with the sun became Elijah in his chariot of fire, and Mithra slaying the bull was figured as Samson killing the lion. The images of "heaven, earth, ocean, sun, moon, planets, the zodiacal signs, the winds, the seasons, and the like, found on Christian sarcophagi and in mosaics and miniatures are…adaptations of Mithraic models. The Moses-Mithra parallel has been commented upon by a number of scholars who suggests a common origin of the motif. As another example of this mythical motif, the Greek sea god Poseidon, in a contest with Athena to win over the inhabitants of Athens, is depicted as striking a rock, from which a spring appears.

Further correspondences between Mithraism and Christianity can be found in the Christian catacombs -- another similarity to Mithra worship, which was practiced in caves -- where there are numerous images of Christ as the Good Shepherd:

…although it is generally agreed that the figure of Jesus carrying a lamb is taken from the statues of Hermes Kriophorus, the kid-carrying god, Mithra is sometimes shown carrying a bull across his shoulders, and Apollo, who in his solar aspect and as the patron of the rocks is to be identified with Mithra, is often called "the Good Shepherd." At the birth of Mithra the child was adored by shepherds, who brought gifts to him.

Indeed, like Christ, Mithra was considered the remover of sin and disease, the creator of the world, God of gods, the mediator, mighty ruler, king of gods, lord of heaven and earth, Good Shepherd, Sun of Righteousness, etc.

========
Robert M. Price - Christ a Myth? (1997)

In broad outline and in detail, the life of Jesus as portrayed in the gospels corresponds to the worldwide Mythic Hero Archetype in which a divine hero's birth is supernaturally predicted and conceived, the infant hero escapes attempts to kill him, demonstrates his precocious wisdom already as a child, receives a divine commission, defeats demons, wins acclaim, is hailed as king, then betrayed, losing popular favor, executed, often on a hilltop, and is vindicated and taken up to heaven.

These features are found world wide in heroic myths and epics. The more closely a supposed biography, say that of Hercules, Apollonius of Tyana, Padma Sambhava, of Gautama Buddha, corresponds to this plot formula, the more likely the historian is to conclude that a historical figure has been transfigured by myth.

And in the case of Jesus Christ, where virtually every detail of the story fits the mythic hero archetype, with nothing left over, no "secular," biographical data, so to speak, it becomes arbitrary to assert that there must have been a historical figure lying back of the myth. There may have been, but it can no longer be considered particularly probable, and that's all the historian can deal with: probabilities.

There may have been an original King Arthur, but there is no particular reason to think so. There may have been a historical Jesus of Nazareth, too, but, unlike most of my colleagues in the Jesus Seminar, I don't think we can simply assume there was.

2) Specifically, the passion stories of the gospels strike me as altogether too close to contemporary myths of dying and rising savior gods including Osiris, Tammuz, Baal, Attis, Adonis, Hercules, and Asclepius. Like Jesus, these figures were believed to have once lived a life upon the earth, been killed, and risen shortly thereafter. Their deaths and resurrections were in most cases ritually celebrated each spring to herald the return of the life to vegetation. In many myths, the savior's body is anointed for burial, searched out by holy women and then reappear alive a few days later.

READ your Joseph Campbell about hero archetypes.

=-==================


The Upanishads were written in 100 - 500 BCE. The Hindus were writing in the Bronze Age (3000 BCE and beyond)

===================
In 1921, archaeologists uncovered evidence of an ancient civilization along the Indus River, which today runs through northwest India into Pakistan. The so-called Indus Valley civilization (also known as the "Harappan civilization" for one of its chief cities) is thought to have originated as early as 7000 BC and to have reached is height between 2300 to 2000 BC, at which point it encompassed over 750,000 square miles and traded with Mesopotamia.

Some writings of this period has been discovered, but unfortunately in such small amounts that they have yet to be deciphered. Knowledge of this great civilization's religion must therefore be based on physical evidence alone. Baths have been found that may indicate ritual bathing, a component of modern Hinduism. Some altar-like structures may be evidence of animal sacrifice, and terracotta figures may represent deities. An important seal features a horned figure surrounded by animals, which some conjecture is a prototype of Shiva, but it could be a bull parallel to that found on Mesopotamian seals.

============

"The rest of the ancient world had a shaky grasp of physical phenomena."

What about these guys?
So the guys walking around in the desert didn't know anything about science? The people in India knew all sorts of mathematical and scientific things. Here are a few of them:

Aryabhatta (476 CE) - Master astronomer and mathematician
Born in 476 CE in Kusumpur ( Bihar ), Aryabhatta’s intellectual brilliance remapped the boundaries of mathematics and astronomy. In 499 CE, at the age of 23, he wrote a text on astronomy and an unparallel treatise on mathematics called “Aryabhatiyam.” He formulated the process of calculating the motion of planets and the time of eclipses. Aryabhatta was the first to proclaim that the earth is round, it rotates on its axis, orbits the sun and is suspended in space - 1000 years before Copernicus published his heliocentric theory. He is also acknowledged for calculating p (Pi) to four decimal places: 3.1416 and the sine table in trigonometry. Centuries later, in 825 CE, the Arab mathematician, Mohammed Ibna Musa credited the value of Pi to the Indians, “This value has been given by the Hindus.” And above all, his most spectacular contribution was the concept of zero without which modern computer technology would have been non-existent. Aryabhatt was a colossus in the field of mathematics.



Bhaskaracharya II (1114-1183 CE) - Genius in algebra
Born in the obscure village of Vijjadit (Jalgaon) in Maharastra, Bhaskaracharya’s work in Algebra, Arithmetic and Geometry catapulted him to fame and immortality. His renowned mathematical works called “Lilavati” and “Bijaganita” are considered to be unparalled and a memorial to his profound intelligence. Its translation in several languages of the world bear testimony to its eminence. In his treatise “Siddhant Shiromani” he writes on planetary positions, eclipses, cosmography, mathematical techniques and astronomical equipment. In the “Surya Siddhant” he makes a note on the force of gravity: “Objects fall on earth due to a force of attraction by the earth. Therefore, the earth, planets, constellations, moon, and sun are held in orbit due to this attraction.” Bhaskaracharya was the first to discover gravity, 500 years before Sir Isaac Newton . He was the champion among mathematicians of ancient and medieval India . His works fired the imagination of Persian and European scholars, who through research on his works earned fame and popularity.



Acharya Kanad (600 BCE) - Founder Of Atomic Theory
As the founder of “Vaisheshik Darshan” - one of six principal philosophies of India - Acharya Kanad was a genius in philosophy. He is believed to have been born in Prabhas Kshetra near Dwarika in Gujarat . He was the pioneer expounder of realism, law of causation and the atomic theory. He has classified all the objects of creation into nine elements, namely: earth, water, light, wind, ether, time, space, mind and soul. He says, “Every object of creation is made of atoms which in turn connect with each other to form molecules.” His statement ushered in the Atomic Theory for the first time ever in the world, nearly 2500 years before John Dalton . Kanad has also described the dimension and motion of atoms and their chemical reactions with each other. The eminent historian, T.N. Colebrook , has said, “Compared to the scientists of Europe , Kanad and other Indian scientists were the global masters of this field.”



Nagarjuna (100 CE) - Wizard Of Chemical Science
He was an extraordinary wizard of science born in the nondescript village of Baluka in Madhya Pradesh . His dedicated research for twelve years produced maiden discoveries and inventions in the faculties of chemistry and metallurgy. Textual masterpieces like ” Ras Ratnakar ,” “Rashrudaya” and “Rasendramangal” are his renowned contributions to the science of chemistry. Where the medieval alchemists of England failed, Nagarjuna had discovered the alchemy of transmuting base metals into gold. As the author of medical books like “Arogyamanjari” and “Yogasar,” he also made significant contributions to the field of curative medicine. Because of his profound scholarliness and versatile knowledge, he was appointed as Chancellor of the famous University of Nalanda . Nagarjuna’s milestone discoveries impress and astonish the scientists of today.

----------------
These are only a few examples of what the Hindus discovered thousands of years ago.


------------
You do know that there is no contemporary account of the existence of jesus when he supposedly lived?
You do know that Bethlehem as a city did not exist during the alleged life of jesus?
You do know that the story about Joseph and Mary having to travel for a census is complete bull?

Rudolf Bultmann said that we could explain everything Jesus did nowadays with modern medicine and scientific explanations. They probably built up Jesus as a miracle worker to make him the Messiah because the believers in him as the Messiah were a small group that ended up taking over the system because of Constantine.

Bultmann was convinced the narratives of the life of Jesus were offering theology in story form, rather than historical events and largely accurate quotations from Jesus. Spiritual messages were taught in the familiar language of ancient myth, which has little meaning today. For example, he said:

============
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Too much arrant nonsense for me to deal with all at once right now.
I'll be getting back to this piecemeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dimbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Interesting post.
It has to be admitted you assert some things that may or may not be true. So little is known of Mithraic doctrine that not much can be stated with any degree of certainty.

The very latest scholarly opinion (that I know of) is that rather than borrowing back and forth from each other, both Christianity and Mithraism take from a common source, the great body of pagan legendry. Roger Beck has a remarkable book on the subject, which unfortunately is both crushingly expensive and hard sledding, but comprehensive.

Example: Mithras and JC both born on the same day, but just because that day was the winter equinox. The astrological symbols were hardly Mithraic in origin, they were the common lore of the day. They show up in synagogues, churches, the Vatican, and so on.

Mithras the Roman invention is probably just as distant from his Persian antecedent Mitra as Jesus the Roman invention is from the itinerant exorcist of Galilee. In so many words, the early investigators of Mithraism led by Cumont made a leap of faith that wasn't justified. In fact that idea that Mithras and Mitra are closely connected persists today on Iranian propaganda sites.:)

I am glad you brought up the fact that so many Christian churches are built on Mithraea. They are in fact specifically so built to make the statement that Christianity had conquered its main opponent. It is the architectural equivalent of spitting on an enemy's grave. That's a rough point for apologists. :)






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. I took my religion courses at a very fine Presbyterian university.
It was required, when I got my B.A., in the 1970s, to take six hours of religion.
The first course was the intro course: Nature and Function of Religion. We read about things like: What is a religion? What is a myth? What is a primitive religion? Why do we have religion?(Freud), Why do we have rituals and symbols?
Read Notes from the Underground, Freud, Jung, Ludwig Feuerbach, Paul Tillich, Mircea Eliade, Joseph Campbell, Sir James Frazier, Jacob Needleman, etc.

My second course was Old Testament as History. Prof of both courses has a Doctor of Divinity from Princeton Theological Seminary. Dr. Francisco Garcia-Treto. Most amazing linguist I have ever seen. Knew Spanish (his dad was minister of the First Presbyterian Church of Havana, so the Catholics dumped their garbage on the steps of the church). Knows Greek, Hebrew, Latin, Amharic, Aramaic, said he formerly could read Linear B (Babylonian cuneiform).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dimbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I notice you reference Robert Price. Very interesting character.
http://www.robertmprice.mindvendor.com/

The only serious theologian I am aware of who is also an expert in the Great God Cthulhu. (fact)

Unfortunately, Price is also an individual who can't seem to make up his mind. E.g. denying the reality of Jesus and at the same time being a regular churchgoer.

Perhaps we should take to heart the NT dictum to mistrust recent converts. They're sadly likely to believe something else next week.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. What is zeitgeist-Murdock woo woo??
I assume you misspelled "Zeitgeist" - spirit of the age.

I have no idea who the Murdock you are talking about is, except that it's not James or Rupert, currently in hot water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. #2 is echoed on DU and elsewhere.
How DARE atheists have opinions about religion and the religion-saturated society they live in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. #2 is correct because no one likes be lied to or had nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC