Right-wingers are getting rid of TALKING about abortion....

[renaissanceguy]

and want gay people to die of AIDS.


----------------------------------------------------------

Right-Wing Chilling Effect Makes 'Reproductive Rights' Too Hot for Public Radio

Mon Nov 22, 8:23 AM ET

Add to My Yahoo! World - OneWorld.net

Jim Lobe, OneWorld US

WASHINGTON, D.C., Nov 22 (OneWorld) The refusal by a North Carolina affiliate of National Public Radio (NPR) to run an underwriting announcement by a local group that carries out family-planning activities abroad is raising fears that the leadership of federal regulatory agencies may try to enforce a new kind of right-wing political correctness.

• Communications Consortium Media Center
• OneWorld on Gender


Supported by
Cable & Wireless



Coming in the wake of the cut-off of funds to HIV (news - web sites)/AIDS (news - web sites) prevention organization that discuss men who have sex with men and the investigation by the Internal Revenue Service (news - web sites) (IRS) of the National Association for the Advanced of Colored People (NAACP), the action by the Chapel Hill-based WUNC radio station is being cited as evidence of a growing chilling effect on free expression.

A statement released Thursday by 22 national feminist, health and population organizations decrying WUNCs refusal to run an underwriting statement that identified the sponsor, Ipas, as a non-profit group that protects womens reproductive rights, charged that the decision threatens the very concept of free speech.

We are both outraged and saddened by WUNCs decision to cave in to the implicit threats of the Bush administration and are hopeful that they will recognize that a free press has a duty to defend the right of free speech, declared the letter, which was signed by Population Connection, the International Planned Parenthood (news - web sites) Federation (IPPF), the Womens Edge Coalition, and the Population Connection, among others.

Ipas, which provided family-planning and reproductive-health training, research, advocacy, and supplies in some 40 countries on five continents, began underwriting programming at the rate of about US$1,700 a month at WUNC last February. In return, the radio station, which is based at the University of North Carolina campus, ran occasional on-air acknowledgements of Ipas support.

The original announcement read: Ipas, a Chapel Hill-based nonprofit that protects womens reproductive health and rights at home and abroad. More information available at www.ipas.org. In October, however, the station informed Ipas that the word rights would not longer be permitted.

After several weeks of negotiation over the wording, Ipas announced Friday that it would was ending its underwriting arrangement. We highly value WUNC listeners and want to inform them about our work, said Ipas president Elizabeth Maguire, but there is no alternative language. Promoting reproductive rights is half Ipas mission, and WUNCs position denies Ipas the right to describe itself accurately and completely.

WUNC general manager Joan Siefert Rose defended the decision, describing it as a precautionary measure designed to protect the station from possible action by the Federal Communications Commission (news - web sites) (FCC (news - web sites)).

As a noncommercial broadcaster, she told Associated Press, we are not allowed to broadcast donor acknowledgments that include language with political meaning. My first responsibility is to be a good steward of our FCC license.

While Rose conceded that the FCC has never defined reproductive rights as falling within the proscribed category for advertisers or underwriters, she stressed that the FCC can still punish stations retroactively if it determines that the words should not have been aired.

They dont tell you what you can and cannot do, she said, comparing the situation to ABCs decision last week against airing Saving Private Ryan for fear that the FCC might find that its graphic violence and language violated its regulations.

Reproductive rights has indeed become politically controversial under the Bush administration which has repeatedly tried usually without success to have the phrase deleted from communiqus and declarations at international conferences. Administration officials have described the phrase as implicitly asserting a womans right to have an abortion a notion with which it and its Christian Right constituency strongly disagree.

Its efforts to undermine the concept reproductive rights have also included its last-minute withdrawal of funding for a major international health conference in Washington last spring because one of the featured speakers had publicly attacked the priority given by the administration to its abstinence-only agenda and the imposition of the so-called Global Gag Rule.

The gag rule forbids foreign non-governmental agencies that receive U.S. foreign aid from engaging in any abortion-related activities - including even providing information about abortion to their medical clients or lobbying their own governments to ease anti-abortion laws -- even if they use their own money for those purposes.

Ipas, which refused to tell its overseas partners to stop abortion-related activities, forfeited some US$2 million in funding as a result of the gag rule.

In its negotiations with WUNC, the group argued that reproductive rights encompass much more than abortion. It also includes the right to information about reproductive health, infertility treatments, and contraception, according Maguire, who described the phrase as a mainstream concept based on the U.S. Constitution, Supreme Court decisions, U.S. laws, and multiple international agreements signed by the U.S.

In addition to the gag rule and its efforts at international forums to delete reproductive rights from the agenda, the administration has also ordered audits against organizations that oppose the administrations abstinence-only agenda.



Each of these actions, as well as the IRS investigation of the NAACP and the cut-off of funding to groups that deal explicitly with men who have sex with men, according to the groups that wrote in support of Ipas, sends a clear message: dissent at your peril.

Under the Bush administration, regulatory agencies have been used with an appalling frequency to punish those organizations that do not conform to its narrow ideological position, the groups wrote, noting that WUNCs fear about possible FCC action were not unreasonable.

According to Ipas Maguire, the WUNCs decision feeds into an environment in which self-censorship is becoming more prominent.

That assessment was echoed in a second letter sent to the station last week by nearly 100 prominent contributors living in the WUNC listening area, including faculty at Duke University and the University of North Carolina, community groups, writers, business people, elected officials, artists and writers.

We feel that the extraordinary caution exhibited by this decision is undue and serves to perpetuate self-censorship, which is all to prevalent in the current political climate, the letter stated. We count on public radio to expose and resist such tendencies, not to reinforce them.

[LeighAnn]

1. As long as right-wingers' daughters are getting pregnant out of wedlock

they'll still be having abortions, but they won't let you talk about it. The most abortions performed in the metro I live in are performed on women from the richest, whitest neighborhoods, according to some numbers I saw back in the '90s.

[Jackie97]

2. Got fascism?

“The original announcement read: Ipas, a Chapel Hill-based nonprofit that protects womens reproductive health and rights at home and abroad. More information available at www.ipas.org . In October, however, the station informed Ipas that the word rights would not longer be permitted.”

Oh my lord. Don’t call them rights. It might offend forced birth advocates. I have an idea. Let’s keep anti-abortion people from calling themselves “pro-life” on the air. It offends me, so it shouldn’t be allowed. That’s dumb as shit.

I’ve been warning people for a while now that a form of political correctness can affect both sides.

“Reproductive rights has indeed become politically controversial under the Bush administration which has repeatedly tried usually without success to have the phrase deleted from communiqus and declarations at international conferences. Administration officials have described the phrase as implicitly asserting a womans right to have an abortion a notion with which it and its Christian Right constituency strongly disagree.”

What a bunch of fascists! Heck, I disagree with the term “Christian Right”. They act like it’s a Christian’s “right” to shove their religion down everybody else’s throats. I don’t agree with it when they call keeping homosexuals from getting married “pro-marriage”. I don’t agree with it when they call stopping gay adoption “pro-family”. I don’t try to omit their dumb phrases. What a bunch of fascists they are try to omit our valid statements.

“Each of these actions, as well as the IRS investigation of the NAACP and the cut-off of funding to groups that deal explicitly with men who have sex with men, according to the groups that wrote in support of Ipas, sends a clear message: dissent at your peril.”

Why is the IRS investigating the NAACP? I think they should investigate how Bush’s tax cut really works. I believe that those fascists want a Christian theocracy ruled by white people. People want me to stop comparing Bush to Hitler. Well hell, if the stops acting like Hitler, then I’ll stop comparing him.

Sometimes, I think I want to move to another country and relax. Right now, I’m thinking stuff like “Mama’s gotta stay home and kick some fascist ass!”

What’s so funny is that even Bush supporters will whine about this stuff in upcoming years. I don’t whether to graciously accept them to our side or tell them “Stop your whining, you’re getting what you voted for”.

[Moderator]

3. renaissanceguy

Please remember that DU's copyright rules require you to excerpt only four paragraphs from the source, plus a link.