it's an eye opener, especially :
SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE POLICY CONCERNING HOMOSEXUALITY IN THE ARMED FORCES.
Sub.D(d) Benefits- Nothing in this section, or the amendments made by this section, shall be construed to require the furnishing of benefits in <b>violation of section 7 of title 1, United States Code</b> (relating to the definitions of ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’ and referred to as the Defense of Marriage Act).
section 7 of title 1, United States Code:
TITLE 1 > CHAPTER 1 > § 7
7. Definition of “marriage” and “spouse”
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.
Also note that the "repeal" is still subject to the findings of a commission
(C) That the implementation of necessary policies and regulations pursuant to the discretion provided by the amendments made by subsection (f)
is consistent with the standards of military readiness, military effectiveness, unit cohesion, and recruiting and retention of the Armed Forces.And that ladies and germs is a loop hole you can fly a C-5 transport through.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-6520