Marriage is about procreation. It would be nice if someone would inform Hugh Hefner’s current fiancé since it appears that he has gone beyond just shooting blanks to shooting dust. One would swear that he was one of the living undead. This is, of course, the position of the Roman Catholic Church, and it flies in the face of not only recent tradition, but also the majority of Christian teaching over the centuries when marriage was more about making sure who got the property when father dropped dead of the rusty arrow sticking out of his chest than it was about making sure that children were born.
Procreation only really entered into the union in order to make sure that father had someone to hand over the property to, usually after the Church took its cut. Procreation was also a wonderful thing because while the first son went off to inherit the property, the second son went off to get his limbs chopped off in some foreign land that everyone was trying to convert to Christianity, and the third son went off to the priesthood where he was either fooling around with the local barmaids or buggering the young acolytes who wanted to join the priesthood.
Ok, so not all of them were quite that bad, but it is certainly interesting to read Chaucer, especially the parts about the ‘quaint’ in relation to priests, clerks, clerics, and so forth.
So, perhaps if Archbishop Donald Wuerl had spent more time learning the actual history of his own Church rather than the propaganda that they love to push on people, he might have learned a thing or four about marriage. After all, one has to really wonder why a group of people who claim to not be all that interested in marriage are so big on pushing people to conform to their definitions of marriage. It is like the Nun’s Priest in Canterbury Tales discussing the institution of marriage. How is a priest who talks only to nuns suppose to know the first thing about marriage.
http://lezgetreal.com/2010/12/dc-archbishop-marriage-about-procreation/