Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cervical vaccine trial on babies: report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 01:45 AM
Original message
Cervical vaccine trial on babies: report
Edited on Mon Aug-18-08 02:29 AM by Hannah Bell
"doctor who played a key role in trials of a cervical cancer vaccine is proposing testing it on babies.

Suzanne Garland, the director of microbiology and infectious diseases at the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne, is flying to the US to meet with drug companies and will discuss trialling the vaccine on babies up to a few months old, Fairfax newspapers report.

Professor Garland said there were benefits to immunising babies instead of schoolgirls, but one of the questions that would need to be answered was how long the vaccine would last, and whether a booster shot would be necessary years later.

The vaccine has been tested in children only over the age of 10."

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Cervical-vaccine-trial-on-babies-report/2007/08/27/1188066978713.html



No clinical need to test it on babies, of course.

I wonder how many middle-class australian women will offer up their infants for testing?

What do you want to bet: aboriginals in australia, & the rest from poor countries overseas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's best to test these things on babies before parents have time to grow too attached to them.
:sarcasm:

Uhm...

Do you think you could provide a LINK?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. it's in the op now.
(but you could have googled the text if you felt so sarcastic about it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. enough already!!!
Babies have enough vaccines for their systems to deal with. It's not like their going to go out and have sex soon. Give them a break.:grr: Jeeze!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. What if they're raped? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Gardasil can prevent baby rape!
Just step right up to get your baby three jabs of the only aluminum injection clinically proven to prevent baby rape for only $600!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It doesn't prevent the rape. It prevents them from getting cancer from being raped. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. But babies can get regular pap smears !!11!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes, one of the leading causes of cancer is baby rape!
With Gardasil, your raped baby can be one less baby raped cancer victim.

Get working on that jingle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Just when you think it can't get any more absurd.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's certainly lousy journalism.
There is no "cervical vaccine", there is no "cervical cancer vaccine".

Are they talking about the HPV vaccine? Why did they distort the truth so much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Completely nauseating. But HepB was mandated for babies
so why not? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC