Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ares Rocket Passes Milestone Amid Growing Uncertainty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 12:37 AM
Original message
Ares Rocket Passes Milestone Amid Growing Uncertainty

Ares rocket passes milestone amid growing uncertainty

BY STEPHEN CLARK

Posted: August 14, 2009

Engineers added the final piece to NASA's skyscraping Ares 1 test rocket overnight Thursday, topping off the 327-foot-tall demo booster as senior White House officials deliberate whether the agency's moonbound program is still viable.

Launch of the slender white rocket on a test flight dubbed Ares 1-X is scheduled for Oct. 31, but engineers continue to battle concerns with vibrations that could damage critical systems inside the vehicle, according to Jon Cowart, deputy mission manager at Kennedy Space Center.

snip

But the Ares 1 program could be in jeopardy after an independent presidential panel found NASA's plans to return to the moon by the 2020s is impossible given current budget projections.

snip

Officials originally identified problem areas within the upper stage simulator, the flight termination system and first stage steering system.

Cowart said technicians are stiffening brackets inside the simulated upper stage to resolve concerns there. But engineers are still studying mitigation options for the critical flight termination system and hydraulic thrust vector control unit.

snip

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/ares1x/090814stacking/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Regardless of what happens with the Augustine Commission, I'm pretty sure Ares I
is toast. I can't see it surviving much longer. Maybe the engineers will get to see the prototype blast off (and probably explode) before it's officially canceled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. unless NASA relaxes its rules on what it considers 'man-rated'
Edited on Mon Aug-17-09 03:19 PM by pokerfan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I haven't seen many people call it a winner.
In fact, almost every impartial opinion on the subject of that launcher says it's a stinker, and it's counterbalanced only by those who have money to make by dragging it as far as it can go.

The Soviets reached this same impasse with the N1. It was too big, too heavy, too shittily built, couldn't do what they claimed it could do, and blew up on the launchpad with the force of a small nuclear bomb. The N1 project was continued primarily because nobody had the balls to admit it was a piece of crap.

And yet, at the exact same time, the Soviets were busy building the Soyuz system with the express intent of making those capsules capable of going to the Moon and back, if necessary, which means that many parts of the solution--LEO launchers, a moon-rated capsule and service module, and a place to assemble a moon-transit system in space (the ISS) are all right there. Instead, Prince George decided upon his father's course, which is to blow billions on plans and pretty pictures, then fold it all up when you leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC