NASA's Alien Anomalies caught on film

[supernova]

This is a compilation of the weird, the odd and the downright strange to come across NASA and Russian space missions.

I don't think we're being visited by our little green, bug-eyed friends, but it is fun to look at these and think, "What is that?!?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlLN_Jcg1pc&NR=1

[Lost4words]

1. so everybody who has seen something, have really seen nothing?

not much faith in your fellow human beings, I guess they are all crazy,........

[supernova]

2. Where did you get that idea?

I simply said it's a bunch of stuff we have no idea about at this time. I found Storey Musgrave to be one of the most interesting parts.

You can draw your own conclusions.

edit: And I would venture to say, some of those pics, don't look hrmm... inorganic.

[kenfrequed]

3. they were pretty

Though I think there is a phenomena of dust and tiny debris gathering about space vehicles the burning of them during reentry could explain some of the strange lights around the back of vehicles.

Of course most of these space oddities don't fall into that particular explanation but I do not really think they are 'little green men' either.

[supernova]

4. Yes, some of them

did seem to be rocks and small meteors floating by, except for the ones that changed direction. :wtf:

[kenfrequed]

5. well...

Actually I have been wondering if the gravitational effects of a space vehicle wouldn't attract dost and junk to orbit or linger around it. If there are adequate clumps of it moving about as the vehicle reenters these bodies and tiny lumps could burn; You would be surprised how little material it takes to burn very brightly.

[TheMadMonk]

6. Strange(?) that this footage suffers exactly the same drawback of every...

...other bit of oofoe footage. Blury and indistinct.

For the stuff that changes direction (particularly the lunar transit) I'd look far closer to home than the moon. For something to track like that at the distance of the moon we would be looking at speeds measured in tens on kilometres per second, and accelerations in the tens of G's to effect that turnaround. My bet would be something with 6 or 8 legs on the telescope itself.

[supernova]

7. Because a lot of it

is from the 60s and 70s.

Transmission quality wasn't what it is now, if you'll remember what it was like watching those early, grainy images. This is from the space programs. I don't think there was an attempt here to deceive.

[Orsino]

8. I suspect, rather, overzealous attempts at interpretation. n/t