Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Futurology: The tricky art of knowing what will happen next

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 12:29 PM
Original message
Futurology: The tricky art of knowing what will happen next
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12058575

22 December 2010

Futurology: The tricky art of knowing what will happen next
By Finlo Rohrer BBC News Magazine


Cheap air travel was among the predictions (illustration from Geoffrey Hoyle's book)

A 1972 book which predicts what life would be like in 2010 has been reprinted after attracting a cult following, but how hard is it to tell the future?

Geoffrey Hoyle is often asked why he predicted everybody would be wearing jumpsuits by 2010. He envisioned a world where everybody worked a three-day week and had their electric cars delivered in tubes of liquid.

These colourful ideas from his 1972 children's book, 2010: Living in the Future, helped prompt a Facebook campaign to track him down. His work has now been reprinted with the year in the title amended to 2011.

"I've been criticised because I said people wear jumpsuits," explains Hoyle, the son of noted astronomer and science fiction author Fred Hoyle. "We don't wear jumpsuits but to a certain extent the idea of the jumpsuit is the restriction of liberties."

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. To quote a great American philosopher.............
Edited on Thu Dec-23-10 12:39 PM by LongTomH
"It's hard to predict; especially the future!" Yogi Berra

And from Robert A. Heinlein (I think!): "It does not pay a prophet to be too specific."

Edited to add: Arthur C. Clarke did not predict the communications satellite; he invented the concept. He did the math showing at what altitude a satellite's orbital speed would equal the speed of the Earth's rotation, thereby making it stationary to observers on the ground. The proper word is "geostationary."

Edited again: The article stated that other people had predicted geostationary satellites before; I believe they are wrong and Clarke should get the credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. A Slovene, Herman Poto&#269;nik, described a geostationary satellite in 1928
At the end of 1928, he published his sole book, Das Problem der Befahrung des Weltraums - der Raketen-Motor (The Problem of Space Travel - The Rocket Motor) in Berlin.
The publisher, Richard Carl Schmidt, printed the year 1929 as a publishing date, probably from a purely business motive (to keep the book looking new throughout the coming year) and this date is often mistakenly given as the actual date of publication. In 188 pages and 100 illustrations, Potočnik set out a plan for a breakthrough into space and the establishment of a permanent human presence there. He conceived a space station in detail and calculated its geostationary orbit. He described the use of orbiting spacecraft for detailed observation of the ground for peaceful and military purposes, and described how the special conditions of space could be useful for scientific experiments. The book was translated into Russian in early 1935, Slovene in 1986 (by the Slovenska matica), English in 1999 (by NASA) and Croatian in 2004 (by Marino Fonović, published by Labin Art Press).

http://www.investsciencesee.info/NOORDUNG.html


The NASA translation: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4026/contents.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ah, but some things NEVER change.
For example, ever since the 1960's computers that match human intelligence have ALWAYS been "ten years in the future", and always will be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's hope the next big thing is less energy intensive.
Merry Xmas y'all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some of us have outdone him
For example, I now work a no-day week.

Also, jumpsuits are a bitch if you're female and have to use the loo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dimbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. A fabulous resource for this is the Sci Fi covers of the 20s/30s
http://paleo-future.blogspot.com/2008_08_01_archive.html

scroll down a little...........

Particularly the mags edited by Hugo Gernsback. Radio Experimenter, stuff like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC