Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another tool to fight Conficker

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Computers & Internet » Computer Help and Support Group Donate to DU
 
canetoad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 08:38 PM
Original message
Another tool to fight Conficker
Edited on Sun Mar-29-09 08:39 PM by canetoad
I downloaded and installed ThreatFire about a fortnight ago and am pretty impressed by it, especially in view of the threat of the Conficker worm.

It runs nicely in tandem with Avast and only shows one process in task manager, using 3100kb of memory. Review here http://www.securecomputing.net.au/Download/126238,pc-tools-threatfire-40.aspx

FAQ and download here: http://www.threatfire.com/faqs/


PS. It's free :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if this is similar to Comodo's "Defense+" - part of the firewall suite
In any case, I'll take a look at it, thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canetoad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't know much about Comodo
except that it seems popular. This ThreatFire does not seem to behave like a firewall in that it is not asking for permissions for programs to connect to the net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-29-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I like Comodo. It has 3 "pieces" - Firewall, Antivirus and Defense
I think the Defense does what ThreatFire does - it monitors activity, like changes to the registry, and asks if you want to allow it.

In any case, I've dl'd TF and installed it just to check it out. If it doesn't interfer with Comodo, can't hurt to have more protection I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Seems that Comodo's "Defense" function is quite different than ThreatFire.
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 02:29 AM by ConsAreLiars
Just ran a long install where Comodo was asking repeatedly if I wanted to this or that. ThreatFire never popped up. It seems, as it claims, to be looking for some sort of "behavior" that is more suspicious than changing a registry value when installing or updating software.


(edit typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I set Threatfire's "Sensitivity Level" to the highest and I get the same alerts as with Comodo
(Well so far, but I've only done a couple things).

Comodo's Defense is also very customizable, so that you can set it into training mode when you're doing very safe routine things, so it can learn those things and stop alerting you. TF may be the same.

In any case, as long as they don't conflict with each other and neither is a resource hog, I'll keep em both around and see how well they play together.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thanks for the information about setting different security levels in Comodo and TF
Seems Comodo's default is PARANOID (fine by me despite the trouble), while TF is looking for signs that some previously permitted service or app has gone rogue. Seems like the training mode of Comodo is just more permissive. I'll agree with you and keep both running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Comodo had a steep learning curve for me
For the longest time I just ran it without changing any settings or doing anything. Then I decided to try and figure out how it really works - I'm still very naive about some of it, but know enough, I hope, so that I haven't utterly defeated it's purpose.

Sometimes I'll run it in training mode because I'm doing something that results in lots of alerts but that I'm comfortable is safe - and then I forget to return the status to "Safe" (the setting I usually keep it on). So then I go into the settings and delete all of the entries (Defense > Advanced > Computer Security Policy) and start over, just to make sure something hasn't gotten by that shouldn't. PITA, yeah, but probably worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hermetic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks, Cane
I will tell my friends about this one.

I must say though, reading through the licensing agreement, it looks like you're not allowed to use this if you are on the no-fly list. B-)

You stay safe down there.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canetoad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. After you posted this
I had a read through the EULA and it's pretty dammed comprehensive!

cheers mate

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, I got all my MS updates up to date last night.



That might help me be ready for April 01 if anything is really going to happen. I'm taking a sort of a wait-and-see approach. I have found that there are times when updates seem to do more harm than good. That is why I have them on 'notify' as opposed to 'automatic'. Good luck all.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canetoad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Same here lpbk
On the rounds of various usenet groups and forums I regularly see people crying because something is broken after an auto update. At the same time it is easy to determine which are the biggest threats that really need to be patched. I hate it when you have your computer and applications all tuned to be working like a well oiled machine then something unexpected happens to throw a spanner in the works. It may seem like more work but it has done well for me to have all auto updates turned off and only go looking for them as I really need them.

Oh, and it's April 1 here and nothing has turned up in the news about Conficker yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Can I just change the date on my computer to 4/2
to avoid the worm? Or is it smarter than I am? :) Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That will accomplish nothing.
It gets its activation orders from the net, not from your machine's date stamp. If your antivirus programs are current and running, you should be OK, but you may want to read through some of the discussion for more info:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5365866
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=242&topic_id=24192&mesg_id=24192
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Computers & Internet » Computer Help and Support Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC