I have more history to review but my mom recently took up a collection and sold baked goods for Haiti and was shocked at how unconcerned or aware people in the Black community (who were not Haitian) were.
I was stunned when he was taken from power, then confused reading the conflicting news stories. Even on the day he was escorted from his office, while the world was being assured of his voluntarily vacating his country, there was an undercurrent that suggested the precipitating revolt and subsequent removal were all fore-planned by the US. The only voices I heard at that time were from the CBC and, to this day, Haiti remains a background tragedy, occasionally remembered in news reports but never highlighted as significant to us. The Sudan is treated similarly.
But, I can't understand WHY (because I'm a stupid liberal). I read passages like the one clipped below and think, no way, not in 2004:
>"The symbolism of having a populist government in Haiti, that represents the interests of the poor black majority, is intolerable to US foreign policy, especially as all the parallels with the history of US slavery are sure to be drawn," said a well-placed observer who must remain nameless due to the atmosphere of terror in the country. "They want a subservient client in power when the bicentennial comes down. They cannot control Aristide, therefore they must do as they always have in these situations, destroy him and his government by any means necessary."<
http://www.blackcommentator.com/42/42_issues.htmlI'm wordless.