Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK, so I exhalt the virtues of a secular society and some neanderthal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Atheists and Agnostics Group Donate to DU
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:30 AM
Original message
OK, so I exhalt the virtues of a secular society and some neanderthal
screams "STALIN! MAO! POL POT!" in response.

The fact that WE live in a civilized society thanks to secularism doesn't register in their minds.

How, I ask, how to argue? Not trying to convince the neanderthal, but rather enlighten the ones watching the exchange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. There are 78,386 registered members in this forum
There are 297,369,894 people in the United States. I think the odds are that at least one person in those two groups may be an idiot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Generally, I refuse to engage in a battle of wits
with an unarmed opponent. Continue your discussion with those watching the exchange; or smile, thank said cretin for sharing his/her views, and walk away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hmmm. Perhaps this is sound advice. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. In 1994, the most Christianised country in Africa was ....
(Nobody? No guesses?)

... Rwanda!

Plucky little Rwanda's long and happy history under the ministrations of Belgian Christian missionaries had made it the most uniformly Christian and devout countries in Africa, with a highly organised church infrastructure.

That didn't stop millions of people launching the most extraordinary and brutally effective genocide in history, an orgy of slaughter where neighbour killed neighbour at a far greater rate than the Nazis ever achieved. Something like a million people were killed in just 30 days, with nothing more sophisticated than machetes and spears.

The silence of the Rwandan church is a noted part of this awful affair.

A little fact bomb to throw in that kind of conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mass Inanity...
This is a common response. If anyone brings up one of the Minor Unpleasant Incidents in Xian history--Inquistion, witch mania, 30 Years War, Jimmy Swaggart--you can count on this inane comparison to come up EVERY time.

The way I usually address it: ask them to find one nation, specifically set up as an atheist nation, that declared a genocide or war strictly in the name of atheism.

Of course, that can't be done. But you'll have a lot of fun watching them repeat "Stalin was an atheist" a thousand times to keep from answering your question.

This is one of the stock responses, along with:

1. "We don't know whether Jesus existed? Well, we don't know whether Julius Caesar existed either! Did anybody on DU ever meet him? Yuk-yuk-yuk!"

2. "Atheists are so arrogant! If they only knew the unfathomable mind of an invisible and omnipotent deity as well as we do, maybe they wouldn't be like that."

3. "When I recently tried to point out why Xianity is SO obviously the One True Religion, an atheist had the gall to disagree with me. I like some atheists just fine, but I can't stand Atheist Fundamentalists like that one!"

4. "I'm a Xian who majored in philosophy, so let me tell you know-it-all, condescending atheists why you're wrong..." (Insert 100,000 words of random multi-syllabic gobbledygook here.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkUnicorn Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Some data..
You can find some interesting information here.

They substituted the state as a god figure who must be obeyed/worshiped via obedience to the proletariat as opposed to an invisible sky god who must be obeyed/worshiped via obedience to priest figures. As for Stalin, they usually forget to mention he was at an orthodox seminary for 5 years or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arianrhod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. May I make a small request?
Not quite on subject. According to the most recent paleontological research, the Neanderthals belonged to a highly intelligent, creative, artistic branch of the human family that was probably eradicated by the later Cro Magnon species, from which we are directly derived. (We do, however, continue to carry some Neanderthal genes.) The Neanderthal--who constituted the secondary human species for 300,000 years--buried their dead, held to some form of religious beliefs, had brains bigger than ours, created the oldest known art sculpures, and looked so much like us that, were we to spot one at dusk on a city street, we might not glance twice at him.

I tend to cringe every time someone maligns these ancient human beings. Could we maybe find something else to represent cretinism and Dark Ages ignorance? Heck, maybe we should use our own violent, brutish Cro Magnon ancestors. . . .

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Good point.
I'm sure if you shaved a Neanderthal and put him in a suit, we wouldn't be able to distinguish him from a modern man such as, let's say, G.W. Bush.

Of course, the Neanderthal would be acting more intelligently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arianrhod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. hahahaha n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Have you read "The Inheritors" by William Golding?
Wonderful book about the Neanderthals and the arrival of the Cro-Magnons who wipe out their nascent culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arianrhod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Stalin et al never claimed to be acting in the will of God.
All these religionists are doing, therefore, is admitting that their "saved saints" are no better than unsaved sinners.

Their religion has not provided an answer to evil. OTC, all it has done is serve to justify it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. That's probably an insult to neanderthals--LOL
They were bad men, but they were marxists. Actually, Marx was more of a socialist than a secularist. Secularism calls for a separation of church and state and religion has no part in governance. They took Marx's line "Religion is the opiate of the masses" WAY out of context.

Marx wrote in The Opium of the People that religion was the opiate of the masses as a critique of religion as an external method of mind control. Luther and the Reformation began the breaking of that hold. You can read the essay at your leisure, it's more to it than I gave it credit for.

If nothing else, the religious civil wars in Europe's past should highlight the need for a secular government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. You could always respond in precisely the same vein
by screeching back, "Torquemada! Jim Jones! David Koresh! Osama bin Laden!"

it's kind of kindergarten, but does that kind of idiotic taunting deserve an actual rational response?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Atheists and Agnostics Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC