Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SFRC Hearing: 10 AM Condi Rice TEstifying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:01 AM
Original message
SFRC Hearing: 10 AM Condi Rice TEstifying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks Tay. I can look, but I can't listen.
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 10:12 AM by wisteria
I am at work and I have no audio on my computer.
Oh, I am (hopefully) working on that JK speech tape. I had to leave for work, but I have attempted to record it for you.
Oh course, I will want a copy too.


C-Span 3 had about an hour of Biden on before I left for work this morning. Biden was his usual self and actually everything he was saying at this press conference he held has turned out just he opposite of what he predicted. It was from March 06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh dear Lord, just saw a view of Sen. Kerry
Looks like he is praying during Condi's testimony.

I don't blame him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. WTF is Biden on about?
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 10:38 AM by whometense
I do not understand the smarmy bastard.

Condi sweetheart, we know how deeply you care???? Do we????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Every time I click on, Biden is in my face. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Attacking Iran, expanding the war
That's the most important thing Bush said last night and I'm glad Biden got to it. Condi didn't rule out crossing borders to go after Iranians that support the Shiites. Not good at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. If that's what he said, GOOD!
I really have difficulty mining his speech for actual content - it's so laden with meandering blather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. This guy really has problems
He twice addressed Lugar as chairman, once almost as Secretary, he confounded Iraq with Iran, then Syria with Iraq. I don't see him going through a presidential campaign. If they go after him for every misspoken word as they do with Kerry, he will have a really hard time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I'm referring to one question
That was surprisingly concise, so maybe I missed the part you were talking about. Then Condi went to blathering and I had to shut it off again. I'm very upset about this Iran stuff, as I posted the other day. They are entirely too flippant about chasing down these Iranians and Syrians, as if they're chasing down kids who stole candy bars from the local market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Sarcasm, perhaps?
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 10:44 AM by rox63
:shrug:

I can't watch/listen, so I'm depending on the play-by-play from DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Some questions, as I can
Biden: Is the Pres going into Syria and/or Iran to pursue those who aid the insurgency in Iraq.

Condi: Ah, well, we are doing all we can to make sure that we protect our troops and so forth. You know us, we only do things that are purely, absolutely right. We must protect our troops, of course. Ahm, btw, we don't rule out 'dealing' with these countries. (We don't like them. They are rude and mean to us. They never once sent us a Christmas card. They are bad guys.)

Biden: Does the PRes have the right, under the Constitution, to purse policies in those countries.

Condi: Do I look like a Constitutional lawyer? I don't know, don't care.

Biden: If Bush invades Iran & Syria, then he better come back to Congress and get re-authorized. Now, how long do you think American forces will be in Baghdad, going door-to-door with Iraqi troops?

Condi: I don't know. BTW, the Iraqis are doing everything we asked. They are wonderful. It's amazing, considering how insanely great they are that we still have to be there. We are just supporting them, in the way of doing the actual fighting. Other than that, they do it all. (Timeframes are very evil in this White House, btw. Shame on you for asking me this.)

Biden: 6.2 million people in Baghdad, civil war and Bush says, 5 brigades deployed to Baghdad to work alongside Iraqi units. Young marines will be standing next to Iraqis as they break down the door. How long will this be going on? You know, this is dangerous work. Any idea how long our guys have to do it?

Condi: The image of Iraqis doing this is veyr important.

Biden: Condi, are you confident thatMaliki can send out a sufficient number of troops that can stay in the lead and guarantee the safety of our Marines. The Iraqis won't turn on them, right?

Condi: We think Maliki will be a stand-up guy. (Condi crosses fingers on both hands.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Gotta go.
Some summarize Lugar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thanks for the translation! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Dodd
Forceful, and to the point, definitely one of the smart adults around. Calls it "a tactic in search of a strategy". Very good analysis. Condi listens with an unbelievably sour face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
14. Dodd
Dodd: Thank you, thank you. Everyone is showing up and talking. How great. Btw, this is serious business. Iraq is screwed up.

Dodd is not questioning Condi, he is giving a lecture.

Fools paradise describes Iraq today. (Good one.) From an FDR quote. This new plan is same as the old plan. We got an even bigger civil war. Why do we think there will be a different outcome from what Bush said last night.

We should withdraw from active civil war areas. 23 milities operating in Baghdad alone. We have no clue who we are fighting. We can't fight that for a variety of reasons. We should concentrate on helping the Iraqis with infrastructure reconstruction.

Diplomacy needs to be used. Bush ignored this and this recommendation in the ISG. Bush's plan is doomed and won't work. We aren't addressing the real causes of the insurgency and probably can't. Deaths are going up. (Dodd is saying stuff we have already heard. Iraq is a bad place, and this ia bad situation.) Still no hope of a question. Sigh! (Bad. no diplomacy. Real bad. Ahm, no diplomatic solution. Really, awfully bad.) You people suck, btw at diplomacy. Iran and Syria are bad guys. But we still have to talk to them. Really, terribly, completely awfully bad. Bush hates Syria. Still no question in sight.

Will you use diplomacy?

Condi: (She actually found a question in there.) Syria. We did engage them. We had them over for dinner and everything. They were terrible. They didn't even bow to the King or anything. The Syrians were asked to help us stabilize Iraq. However, the Syrians are only thinking of themselves and their interests. (We told them, you scatch our back, we scratch yours. They ignored us.) Now we look weak to them. Bad, bad form.

The Syrians are bad to everyone, the Italians, the Germans, etc. We just don't want to talk to them cuz they are bad, bad people. Iran? Well, we just don't talk to Iran. They are evil. They are trying to kill us. Like Syria, they could stop killing our troops and helping the insurgency but they don't want to. They just want what they want. (We, of course, are not like that. We simply told them what we want and that's what we want. They are stubborn, we are firm in our resolve.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. Hagel: 1970
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 11:08 AM by whometense
government lied to the american people; said they didn't go into Cambodia, but they did.

I know something about this, as do some others on this committee.

:applause:

Edited to add: Hooray for Hagel - he is talking very straight and very tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. Hagel is also against escalation
Is also asking for a at least regional if not international conference. Is talking about Cambodia. If carried out what Bush said yesterday, it's the most dangerous foreign policy blunder since Vietnam! People are clapping!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Cool! He is very aggressive against Condi! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. He just called her
a LIAR to her face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. He was great
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Yup.
JK just nailed the lying. And he called her out on having no Plan B. He made the extremely strong point that Hezbollah and Hamas and other extremist groups are stronger than they were before the war.

If this doesn't work, what is Plan B. Condi said, we have no plan B.

Hagel and Kerry were on fire today. They were incredible. Everyone else can just about go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Too bad Kerry is followed by
l'il Normie.

What a wuss.

Hagel was fantastic; Kerry was too.

What I wouldn't give to see them tag team her for an hour without interruption.

Question: If the dems are in charge, why do they have to stick to this short-form questioning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Condi has no time
Biden said at the beginning that they have only until 1pm because Condi has to testify in the House as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karendc Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
17. Not to hijack
but if you get a minute, please help out here:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/1/11/105125/883

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. Hagel
Hagel: Glad you're hear. Code Pink acting up. Stop the War, etc. (Not referring to you, on the lies thing, Sen. btw.)

Again, thanks for going to the ME. (Isn't that her job?) This issue will be here for some time. I see that you are traveling to the ME. This means follow-up on what we are discussing here. (OMG, that's a first.) No question in sight.

Okay, The Pres speech last night. We owe the military and their families a policy worthy of their sacrifices. (True!) We don't have that today. The PRes talked about an escalation in IRaq and the ME. I do not agree with that escalation. This is a civil war, Iraqi on Iraqi and there is intra-sectarian violence, Shia killing Shia. This is wrong. We won't win a war of attrition in the ME. Yeah, the skeptics have a point you know. The facts on the ground show, this ain't working. (Americans have a right to be pessimistic.) No question in sight. (Oooh, brings up Cambodia and how the US govt lied about that incursion in the VN war. Oooooh. Implies Kerry knows this too.) Iraq is the most dangerous foreign policy blunder in this country since VN. (Applause.)

Is all the Maliki govt in support of this escalation and are our 'allies' escalating? Anybody at all? Or just us?

Condi: No, nobody but us Senator. But, the Iraqis are really stepping up. Honest.

Hagel: Ah, won't we be asking Iraqis to be killing militia? US too? Ahm, gee, isn't that far-fetched.

Condi: Sadr not supportive of this. (Of course.) Ahm, we are working on it with Maliki. He will support us, really. Maliki will take on the militias.

Hagel: Is Maliki supporting this escalation.

Condi: AH, tap dancing. Sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
21. JK's up
Joke? "I'll put down the hammer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Biden is a jerk -
He let Dodd and Hagel have a lot time then tried to cut Kerry mid question. Lugar was way more respectful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. I agree.
Politics? If so, despicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:31 AM
Original message
Kerry got the point across
This Admin is tap-dancing and they have NO BACKUP PLAN if this doesn't work. He completely nailed Condi on her deceptions here. He was awesome. He got more done in 8 minutes than just about anyone else will in the whole rest of the hearing.

Wow! Nice, nice work Senator. You rock! (Go get some chicken soup.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. I have never heard anyone stop a Senator mid question.
This is pathetic. (maybe he knows Kerry was better then him yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. I guess he figures it is ok to go after someone who is down, especially when
that someone is 100 times better than him. That was ignorant and I hope that some good kerry person picks up on it. Biden, throwing his weight around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. He must know Kerry is running
If he isn't, Kerry will subtlely or overtly be able to help people in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. In other words, he isn't taking any chances of being upstaged. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. But wouldn't he also have done that to Dodd?
Dodd just announced this morning that he's running. If Biden was stiffing the competition, you'd think he'd also do the same to Dodd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. Could be he is arrogant not to see Dodd as a threat
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 12:31 PM by karynnj
He wants to be the "foreign policy expert" in the race. Kerry has the name recognition, the money and the ability. Unfortunately, he has more media and part opposition than anyone. Biden may be afraid that te hearings are one natural place where Kerry can show what he can do.

Biden has said he is a candidate for much more than a year. he has never polled more than 4 or 5% - and is usually lower. This in spite of some media push. (especially the Washington Post). He likely sees Kerry as his biggest threat (at minimum splitting some of that vote.) and doesn't even see Dodd. Dodd is new.

Imagine Gore and Kerry (:cry:) don't run. Look at the anti- Clinton race then. If Obama and Edwards seem too green, which elder wins - who is more likable and reasonable? Dodd also could pick up the moral leadership thing naturally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #49
68. that was just too obvious
i just watched it and there is no way it was just about the time. the time has been and usually is an issue but almost never do they cut people off like that. he sure is a punk.

and if Kerry has a cold or any illness, i sure couldn't tell from this. he looked really good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. I wonder if it wasn't Biden trying to play alpha male games
Where he is asserting to Kerry that he (Biden) is more powerful and signalling to everyone that he will not give Kerry any extra respect. Lugar always let Kerry have extra time - simply noting afterwards he let it continue because it was productive.

It becomes clearer and clearer that the establishment Democrats are quite willing to ignore that Kerry was the overwhelming choice of the Democratic voters - far more than Clinton was in 1992 and nearly became President. This and his competence should entitle him to a natural respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #69
70. That sounds plausible to me.
I certainly wouldn't put Biden above such petty crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. What gets me is that it is not just Biden - you have so many
Democrats (Shumer, H Clinton, etc) who have publicly shown, not just lack of respect but disrespect. Kerry is a good strong voice and he does not deserve this. (It is sickening to me because they know how good a statesman and person he is. Biden had it right in 2004, Kerry is a classy guy - How many would say theat about him?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
22. Kerry
JK: You were splitting hairs with the answer to Sen. Hagel. Level of violence is getting worse. This is a large civil war. We saw a different ME than the one you talked about. Speech last night was important for what it did and didn't say. Bush lost an opportunity for bipartisanship. That is fading away. Pres lost the opportunity that the ISG and other things presented. Diplomacy is off the table. Bush is throwing diplomacy away, don't understand why.

You policy is unbelievably off the mark and a failure. The zealot groups in Iraq, Lebananon and so forht are much stronger. The IRaqi govt is saying they don't want these extra troops and we are forcing this on them.

Bush said America's committment is not open-ended. Support of American and Iraqi people is waning. What does the PRes mean when he says support of Americans is not open-ended.

Are you prepared to pull out if it fails.

Condi: The Iraqis now know they must succeed or their people will revolt.

We can see if the Iraqis will do what they say.

JK: What if they don't? (Said twice.)

Condi: Ah....... divert and don't answer the question.

JK: what comes next

Condi: Ah....... babble, babble, babble, talking points. We have great people there, etc.

JK; Yeah, great people and stuff. But if our people and the Iraqis can't do this, what comes next?

We have a lot of empty promises and no action. How are we going to do it?

Condi: ah, we are doing this. Really. Ahm, really.

JK: Why is there not a political resolutin on the table that says that the struggle between Sunni and Shia and the intras-Shia violence etc, What's going on with that. Political piece

Condi: National Oil Law. (That is neutral.) De-Baathificaiton policy, lets some Baathists back. Commitment to provincial elections. (Sunnis like it.) These are the elements of a national reconciliation plan. This is good stuff and the international community will like it. (We have to secure Baghdad first.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
55. Salon War Room
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2007/01/11/one_answer/index.html

...John Kerry just tried to get Rice to say what the Bush administration will do if the Iraqis don't live up to their latest round of promises. Rice refused to deal with the question. "I don't think you go to Plan B," she told Kerry. "You work with Plan A. You give it the best possibility of success."...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
28. Coleman: Cost is too high
Doesn't support Bush's plan either. I'm amazed to see so many Reps abandoning Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
30. Feingold
RF: Condi this is one of the worst foreign policy debacles in US history. We have 140,000 US troops there. It is getting worse and worse. We are getting nowhere on this.

Bush wants more troops, even though his other plans have done nothing. We have had 4 years of failed strategies. The US wants the troops to redeploy out of Iraq.

Feingold is saying that we need to 'use the power of the purse' to get a change of policy in Iraq. (Oooh, cutting off the funding comes up.)

OOops, gotta go.. Can someone summarize Feingold.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
31. Feingold sounds like he is calling to cut funds period
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 11:39 AM by karynnj
(not Kennedy) but completely

Is the US more secure? Condi - yes

Condi: Longer term issue is how the ME evloves.
Feingold: I understand and reject

Feingold: Is Afghanistan better after attacking Iraq
Condi: Not everything is about Iraq

Feingold: what about NK? Iraq is diverting attention
Condi : blah Blah etc

(Feingold notes time up - Biden didn't stop him -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
36. Boxer: "You are not listening to the American people!"
Boxer also cites ISG. "Madame Secretary, you are not listening to the American people!"

Nails Condi on what she said before the SFRC before, that she has NO DOUBT that the Iraqis will care for their own security in a reasonable time frame.

Boxer asks: Wo is paying the prize? Tells the story of one dead soldier; very touching.

America is ALONE. "No country standing with us for this escalation." Brits are bringing troops home. Poland and Australia is all what's left of coalition, no-one joining in surge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. they're a good tag team today--
Dodd, Kerry, Feingold and Boxer--with Hagel thrown in for good measure. But Condi's a true believer--has swallowed Bush's vision. It's just a few of them against the whole Congress, and the whole world.

If things keep going at this pace, who wouldn't predict that the question of impeachment comes up eventually?

It warms my heart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I agree.
OMG, real hearings with teeth. (I am in tears.) This is what we worked for last year.

God, oversight is wonderful. Checks and balances are wonderful. Being able to call Bush to task through this hearing is just so wonderful. Sigh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. You know, my husband the practical ,sensible guy, mentioned that very notion
after Bush's speech last night. I was shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. I'm home sick today so I'm able to watch this.
It's making me feel much better I must say. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Lucky you, well that you can stay home and watch it anyway.
I hope you feel well soon though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. I'm relying on this and other
threads. Feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
40. Nelson, Florida
"Have supported the administration on the war, but cannot support your policies any longer. I have not been told the truth."

Asks if Abizaid and Casey support the surge. Condi confirms and says that it's actually Casey's plan. (Is she lying again?)

Nelson was in Iraq and couldn't believe Iraqi National Security adviser who said it's AlQaida and Baathists but country is not in civil war. Iragi politicians deny what is going on in their country. How could more troops help in such a situation?

Nelson thinks also that intense diplomatic effort is needed in the region.

Biden interrupts again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
44. Voinovich: another disillusioned Rep
"I went along with the president. I bought into this dream of a democratic Iraq. But now I don't think any longer that it will happen."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
46. Number of potential or announced
presidential nominees present: FOUR! If my count is correct... Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. I count four also. LOL.
You know who I think runs circles around the others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. No, please tell :-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
47. Obama is up, someone let me know how he does. Please! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. The way I see it
quite similar to Kerry's. What are the benchmarks to make sure it works, i.e. what does not open ended mean. And what will we do if in 6 months things do not work out, are going to start pahsing down. ANswer: I do not want to be specific, do not want to specualate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
52. Obama: Question is at what point do we have enough?
The solution always seems to be six month away. The sectarian violence always worsen. Obama don't believe assurances from the Maliki government that it's different this time. Want to know what benchmarks are and what consequences if benchmarks not met.

Rice: We are not staying married to the plan if the Iraqis don't live up to expectations. But she doesn't get specific on a date or conditions for withdrawal.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
53. What I find most amazing
is not that JK, Boxer, etc. are very good and critical, but that with the single exception of Corker (I think, I did not listen much), all other republicans have also been quite critical as well. Hagel the most, but unless I missed something, all the others as well. Listening to Murkowski (spelling?) right now, not exactly a firebrand liberal, "I would agree with sen Hagel... I am not conviced as I look at the plan that it is so much different from what we have been doing in the past"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
54. Murkowski also very skeptical of surge n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
56. Menendez: "I didn't vote for the war in the first place."
"One of the best decisions I've ever made."

Surge wrong name; it's escalation. Iraqi troops aren't reliable; simply don't show up. Did president obtain commitment from Maliki that Iraqi troops will go after al-Sadr? Condi confirms that.

Menendez doesn't believe it will work. Benchmarks are without consequences, it doesn't push Maliki to go after militia. Gives Maliki a blank check. Gives Iraqis dependency on US forces. There is no answer on what happens if the plan fails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
57. JK just appeared on CNN
I just caught the tail end of it, but he was criticizing Bush's escalation. CNN was in CNN-Int. mode, so it went out to the world. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Good. Seems he has had enough of everyone not saying what needs to be said about Buish's plans.
I hope they treated him with the respect he deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. Missed it
But if it was on CNNi I hope they will repeat it later, as "Your World Today" continues here until 8pm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
58. Isakson
not sure what he is talking about, killing time, no question, left time for the newcomers, and called Maliki Malaki. Cardin up now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
61. Our guy is up from PA. How is Casey doing? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Casey: Pennsylvania has lost more than 140 troops in Iraq
Death in small town is like earthquake. Obligation he has as senator is to support policies that make sure that losses of life are reduced, especially for policy that is flawed. Doesn't believe that president's policy has support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Thanks, I like that hometown touch and that he honors those in Pa who have died
serving our country, by mentioning them. It is good that he reminds Condi of this also. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
64. Ha, Ha, this must be a tough day for Condi,
Kerry get tough now it is Webb's turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. Webb: just great!
Compares Iran to China. Also hits the IWR and what exactly the president can do for preemptive attacks without authorization from Congress. He's very worried about a conflict with Iran.

Throws down a challenge: why doesn't George W. Bush get on a plane and go to Tehran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. And he ended by,,,
.... suggesting a bold act for B, to get on a plane and go to Tehran, that was kind of fun... Biden wraps up (correctly) emphasizing that they do not have the right to go into Iran, will lead to constitutional crisis (and not only)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
europegirl4jfk Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
65. Webb: Necessity to widen diplomatic approach
Always warned that invading Iraq would empower Iran and that has become reality.There should be negotiations with Iran. Compares Iran to China in the 1970s: aggressive engagement process that brought China eventually in international community.

Is it the position of admin that it possesses authority to take action against Iran without Congressional approval? Of course, Condi doesn't answer this question. *g*

Webb things Bush should go on a plane and go to Iran, as Nixon did when he went to China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC