Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forget HUD dissing Dems; HUD paid a half mil to the hooker limo firm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 03:43 PM
Original message
Forget HUD dissing Dems; HUD paid a half mil to the hooker limo firm
Rep. Louise M. Slaughter's letter to HUD:

Last week, Harper's Magazine's weblog posted an update to its coverage of the federal contracts awarded to Shirlington Limousine and Transportation, Incorporated of Arlington, Virginia. This report indicated that HUD had awarded the company a $519,823 contract. As you may know, the company's president, Christopher D. Baker, has an extensive criminal history including drug possession, attempted robbery, and car theft along with other offenses over the last decade. Additionally, allegations have been bade that suggest that individuals involved in an ongoing Congressional bribery investigation used the limousine service to provide escorts and other services to federal officials in exchange for federal contracts. The fact that a contract from your agency has been awarded to a company embroiled in such a serious criminal investigation raises significant questions about the HUD's procurement process.

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/000608.php#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. H.U.D now is Hookers Us Deliver
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. didn't Homeland Security give them a 21.2 million contract
Edited on Wed May-10-06 04:07 PM by MissWaverly
nothing like making the homeland more secure

Since my report, Shirlington's role in the case has been covered by national media including the San Diego Union-Tribune, whose reporting on the Cunningham case is indispensable, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, as well as by bloggers Jason Vest at POGO and Laura Rozen at War and Piece. I reported that Shirlington had won a $21.2 million contract from DHS last year, and the Post found a second contract from the agency, worth $3.8 million, awarded in 2004. Vest found yet another contract for Shirlington: $342,555 from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. And Rozen unearthed a number of interesting finds, including an old Atlanta Journal Constitution article on poker parties that were apparently sponsored by Wilkes.


http://www.harpers.org/sb-red-lights-followup-21985.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It doesn't surprise me that the MSM is not touching this issue
Edited on Wed May-10-06 04:23 PM by Robbien
It appears Abramoff and the Hooker Limo touches many departments and many levels up and down this GOP government. The brownshirts are probably riding herd on MSM to keep them on a short lease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, but how much money was siphoned off
How many times have you heard that there's not enough money for social security but there's
millions available from Homeland Security for a "limo service" and there's thousands from a
Nuclear Regulatory Agency for the same limo service. What does a Nuclear Regulatory Agency
need a limo service for???? How many other agencies were used to siphon the money into
this limo service. They really need an investigation of what has been going on, this is
the worst abuse of the public trust that I have ever seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's got to squirt out into the mainstream at some point -- there's
just too much of it to control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. it's too bad that Monica was not involved in this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. But so few media outlets are willing to buck the GOP.
Just dribs and drabs.

Come on, this story has HOOKERS! The talking heads are salivating over this story but they say nothing, on air that is.

I bet even Russia doesn't have as tight a rein on their media as we have here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. You sure would think so...
But it seems there is a rock solid evil alliance with the corporatists state now in power.
Like Big Eddy says, "There aint no liberals owning any media out there. I can tell ya that." True, big media is owned by big money interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. It's a staggering amount of money
for 12 shuttles and 8 (or was it 10?) limos. How many rides is that y'think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. this is only the tip of the scandal
I feel that there were probably many agencies all with contracts to these same individuals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. this has got to be a payola scheme
for every dollar this "front" coporation rec'd, they probably got 60 cents back under the table,
this is their own little "tax" shelter, it's their shelter with our taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamondsndust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. isn't this Clintons fault?? seriously though...
This company needs to be investigated fully and it's owners exposed. Follow the money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If Clinton even sent Socks to the vet using this service
it would have been investigated for 10 years, it's too bad that he never even parked next to
the limo while he was in DC doing a book signing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Uh, so the limo firm did like Bush then? For HUD to - uh...pump
money into that, right? Not like the bad contractor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. but who is the bad contractor
some of this seems to be sleight of hand, one of the contractors involved with the "hookergate"
seems like a dummy corporation, it's main purpose seems to have been to get paid with tax dollars for no services and then funnel the money back with campaign contributions, and lobbying
activities: like "poker parties, etc. So who is the "bad contractor" - seems like he is us,
since this money is coming from our tax dollars. The same thing with the so called "contracts"
for this limo service. There's no way a local DC limo service should have received millions++++
in government contracts and how many agencies had contracts with this 1 service. This is another dirty payola scheme. We are paying for them to party. That's what GOP stands for
the Grand Old Party!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. Who hands out these contracts? David Safavian was Director of Procurement
He handed out the Katrina contracts before he was arrested ~

Are contracts like this, worth milions of dollars, not approved by Congress? Are they handed out at the discretion of the President's appointees? Why would Rep. Slaughter not have known about this? Sorry, I don't know how all this works, but if this much money can be given to a crook like this man who runs the Limo Svc. and no one knows about it in Congress, then that needs to be changed, imo.

It's just mind-boggling!! They care nothing about this country or its people. And to think we waste time calling and faxing them about bills and thinking they care what we think!! They act as though the treasury is their own personal play money!!

Why is Rep. Slaughter the only one asking about this and WHERE IS THE MEDIA?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. this is after we were subjected to hundreds of hours of
self righteous hand wringing over Bill Clinton's indiscretions, they certainly knew every nuance
of the Monica escapade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC