|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:18 PM Original message |
Poll question: Does Iran have a right to acquire nuclear weapons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. I Put Absolutely Not. But I Do Think They Have Every Right To Develop It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. I chose the third one. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Another possibility is occurring to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greyl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yes, that too. :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. I Disagree. I Think Anyone Can Tell Them That. But I Think The Countries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 05:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. An armed and dangerous fool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 05:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Tis True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tuvor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. As long as they don't acquire more than the USA already has. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radwriter0555 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
6. WHAT RIGHT does the US have to enforce ANY international agreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. First off, let's not buy the spin that Iran is trying to develop nukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tech3149 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
8. Can you point to any public statement from Iran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. My question doesn't depend on a public policy of Iran's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
9. Israel has nukes...why shouldn't others be allowed to defend themselves? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
11. Five years ago I would have said no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
15. I voted yes, but my honest belief is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tatertop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
16. Yes. And they better hurry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 09:57 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Do you think that just because they have them they'd use them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 05:59 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. I'd Just As Soon Not Find Out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 07:56 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. How do you propose to do that, now that Pandora's box is open? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPKrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. How About UN Sanctions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-25-06 09:49 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. They aren't armed with nukes at the moment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
19. The world will be a better place when Iran can't be bullied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. No one KNOWS if they would use them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 12:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. The US is the only country besides Pakistan and India |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. The entire middle-east should be a nuclear free zone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 06:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. How about the entire world? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 07:08 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. The sooner the better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
25. Iran having nukes is a phoney issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Warren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-25-06 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
30. No country that has nukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-25-06 10:03 AM Original message |
I said "As an NPT signatory, no", BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsTryska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-25-06 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
31. Hmm..torn...as signatories to the NPT, no...but as a sovereign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC