Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mike Malloy's blog: Has he mentioned yet tonight....?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:02 PM
Original message
Mike Malloy's blog: Has he mentioned yet tonight....?
http://www.mikemalloy.com/

Arguably – and some will say it’s a stretch – there are three basic reasons Al Gore lost the Presidency in 2000. First, the unending media attack he withstood during the entire campaign. No matter what he did the media were on him like white on rice.

The incessant repetition of ugly, apocryphal stories was unlike anything in modern US politics. Stories that were known to be fabrications by the columnists and journalists endlessly repeating them were picked up and chewed on 24/7 by the right-wing vermin who infest cable television. They, the TV thugs, were pissed because Clinton escaped conviction in the Senate, after all their hard and extremely hypocritical work at demonizing his penny-ante affairs and infidelities. So, here, by god, was a way to get even: eviscerate Clinton’s VP, the decent, talented and fully prepared presidential candidate, Al Gore. After a seemingly endless negative media campaign against him, Gore was exhausted and angry and ready to give it up. Second, the understandable refusal on Gore’s part to challenge – really challenge – the voter fraud that took place in Florida. The singularly disgusting and highly successful theft engineered by Governor Jeb Bush and the utterly execrable Secretary of State (and Bush Florida co-campaign manager) Katherine Harris should have been cause for voter outrage across the nation.

But, this is not Serbia or Ukraine or the former Soviet state, Georgia. The voters in those countries went ballistic when election results were tampered with by right-wing thugs. But, not here. No, this is the United States. If we watch an election being stolen we get pissed because the television coverage is pre-empting some horseshit like “Who Want To Be A Millionaire.” When representative government was being destroyed in 2000, we did nothing. And after the election was stolen and the theft was okayed and blessed by five right-wing members of the US Supreme Court, the media did nothing to alert US citizens that we had just experienced a bloodless coup that would take the country into the chaos we now are experiencing. It was left to expatriate journalist Greg Palast to patiently explain to Americans – from the UK, for god’s sake - how they had just moved from democracy to dictatorship.

And, third, the refusal of US media to acknowledge the results of their own investigation of the Florida fraud and theft once Palast had shamed them into at least a look at what had happened in Florida. And, now, with Gore making films about the probable outcome of global warming, giving lectures and speeches on the same topic in addition to pointing out the obvious destruction by the Bush Crime Family of our system of self-government, and, in general, warning us that if we don’t take control of the horrific mess these Bush bastards have gotten us into, we have truly reached a point of no return: rational Democracy is dead; long live religious fanaticism and corporatism disguised as a uniquely degenerate brand of US fascism. And how are media responding to Gore now, now that they have been told by the country’s numero uno law enforcement officer, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, they are subject to arrest and conviction and imprisonment for reporting the crimes of this sick bunch of Bush appointees; that such reporting will be considered crimes against the State; that the precedent for this new clampdown on the free exchange of vital information is to be found in a law passed in 1917 that has never been used to enforce the sort of toxic, totalitarian secrecy now demanded by the Bush Crime Family?

Media are responding by going after Gore yet again. Snarky, patronizing reviews of his film; snotty, jealous editorials and columns about his obvious intellect and his seemingly sudden return to the public stage; it’s as though media are trying to show Gonzales they are willing to get on board. No more investigative pieces. No more whistle-blower articles (unless it’s about the use of NASA computers to download porn). No more embarrassing exposures of corrupt politicians (unless it’s some lower level Democrat from a Congressional backwater). The deal with the Devil, in other words, has been made. From whoredom to the less difficult life of the political pimp, the once-respected US media are finished, done, dead. What a shame. What a shameful ending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. damn fine piece of writing. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. What shame?
And, third, the refusal of US media to acknowledge the results of their own investigation of the Florida fraud and theft once Palast had shamed them into at least a look at what had happened in Florida.

US media has no shame. This is why Colbert's remarks were so delightful to them and to the Chimp. They know we're onto them. I boycott them, getting my news from FSTV, Link, AAR, and blogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. K @ R this needs to be read by everyone. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Go Mike!!
Mike's instincts are always right on. I do however, think there was more than payback for Clinton's infidelities that put the press on him. According to Mike:

"They, the TV thugs, were pissed because Clinton escaped conviction in the Senate, after all their hard and extremely hypocritical work at demonizing his penny-ante affairs and infidelities. So, here, by god, was a way to get even: eviscerate Clinton’s VP...."

I think the corporate take-over of the press was well underway and they found it easy to ridicule Gore gleefully since they had no way to anticipate the thoroughly evil regime that was about to take hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. K and R
Edited on Tue May-23-06 05:54 PM by realpolitik
And I agree that the shame will cling to American journalism, once offered a sacred place in the American Experiment, and on whom so much depended for our continued freedom, and on which depended the union, becuase if we are not to be a democracy, neither will we be united in any meaningful way.

May the whores choke on this knowledge, and die of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. result of media consortium report on FL vote was to be released 9-15-01
or at least just after 9-11.

They weren't going to release it--'9-11 changed everything', ya know--but were forced to release it. It came out about 3-4 weeks after it was originally supposed to be released; it needed 'editing' is what I remember.

The report showed that in 90+% of the possible ways the votes could have be counted Gore won. BUT the first release had as headline 'Bush would have won'; only late in the article was it stated that this was true only on the basis of a small percentage of the possible methods.

The headline was what most remember, so many people think that W 'won' no matter how FL 2000 votes might have been counted.

(Disclaimer: exact date of planned release, the time lapse before the report was released, and the exact percentage of counting methods in which Gore won--all these are approximate, but true in general to what I remember about those dark days.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And the only method favorable to Bush was partial recount
Gore won every scenario that involved counting all the legal ballots. Harris certified a total that included illegal ballots and excluded legal ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC