Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

YELLOWCAKE & THE HALF BAKED CASE FOR WAR (Vanity Fair on NIGER DOCS & WH)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:03 PM
Original message
YELLOWCAKE & THE HALF BAKED CASE FOR WAR (Vanity Fair on NIGER DOCS & WH)
Edited on Tue Jun-06-06 05:21 PM by kpete
The War They Wanted, The Lies They Needed
The Bush administration invaded Iraq claiming Saddam Hussein had tried to buy yellowcake uranium in Niger. As much of Washington knew, and the world soon learned, the charge was false. Worse, it appears to have been the cornerstone of a highly successful "black propaganda" campaign with links to the White House
By CRAIG UNGER

It's a crisp, clear winter morning in Rome. In the neighborhood between the Vatican and the Olympic Stadium, a phalanx of motor scooters is parked outside a graffiti-scarred 10-story apartment building. No. 10 Via Antonio Baiamonte is home to scores of middle-class families, and to the embassy for the Republic of Niger, the impoverished West African nation that was once a French colony.

Though it may be unprepossessing, the Niger Embassy is the site of one of the great mysteries of our times. On January 2, 2001, an embassy official returned there after New Year's Day and discovered that the offices had been robbed. Little of value was missing—a wristwatch, perfume, worthless documents, embassy stationery, and some official stamps bearing the seal of the Republic of Niger. Nevertheless, the consequences of the robbery were so great that the Watergate break-in pales by comparison.

A few months after the robbery, Western intelligence analysts began hearing that Saddam Hussein had sought yellowcake—a concentrated form of uranium which, if enriched, can be used in nuclear weapons—from Niger. Next came a dossier purporting to document the attempted purchase of hundreds of tons of uranium by Iraq. Information from the dossier and, later, the papers themselves made their way from Italian intelligence to, at various times, the C.I.A., other Western intelligence agencies, the U.S. Embassy in Rome, the State Department, and the White House, as well as several media outlets. Finally, in his January 2003 State of the Union address, George W. Bush told the world, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

Two months later, the United States invaded Iraq, starting a conflict that has killed tens of thousands of people, cost hundreds of billions of dollars, and has irrevocably de-stabilized the strategically vital Middle East. Since then, the world has learned not just that Bush's 16-word casus belli was apparently based on the Niger documents but also that the documents were forged.

much more:
http://www.vanityfair.com/features/general/articles/060606fege02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
This is the point: They'll fake anything to fake their reasons for their fake governing.

It's all about the power and money, and how to look like they're really legitimate.

Wake up, sheeples. They'll do anything. Anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. there is not a single thing that is too outrageous
for me to believe that they did for gain

not a single thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. from forging evidence to aiding and abetting terrorists...
I'm with you. I put nothing past these bastards. Absolutely nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. how bout this?


only thing that makes me wonder is WTF happened to the passengers, cause there was apparently almost NO debris, including titanium engine bits

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flight77.htm

I have no idea how the stuff on this site holds up, and I know lots of people feel Griffin is nuts, but, as has been said here, does anyone doubt that they're capable of ANYthing?

lookit the freakin WAR they started, and the NEXT one looming on the horizon....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. and why isn't there an outcry for THIS?
Edited on Tue Jun-06-06 06:44 PM by Gabi Hayes
1 release the missing frames of the pentagon's cctv video

2 release the cctv video of the "mysterious hotel" (the Sheraton National ?)

3 release the NEXCOMM/CITGO-gas station video

4 release other videos or photos like the Virginia department of transports,
or from the sites over which flight 77 flew on 9/11

5 ask the BBC, public media of the United Kingdom, USA ally, to release the images shown during Ehud Barak's interview on sept. 11

6 allow independent experts to examine the debris of the crash on the pentagon, with witnesses having gathered these debris to identicate them

7 make some holes in the newly brought materials on the pentagon helicopter field, down to the original soil, and verify that there is no uranium on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. I have never heard about the Barak interview. How would it
pertain to 9-11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. You haven't seen the pics with the debris?
I saw them finally and decided, Yep, it was a plane.. since before I never saw suitcases, wheel housings, engines.. then I DID see those photos so it makes it extremely possible that a plane DID smack into that building..

I did 4 years in the Air Force and have seen crash sites, don't see any problem with the story as it stands.

NO jets being scrambled on the other hand is very bothersome to me, no one is going to make me believe the entire eastern seaboard was unguarded by the USAF..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. An you are absolutely right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jan 2, 2001?
Hmmmm... Clinton was technically still in charge when the robbery took place.

So, does that mean that the Bushbots were actively working on invading Iraq before he even took office? What scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. very interesting...
It might be that the January 1, 2001 robbery was unrelated to the forged document(s) purporting the existance of an Iraq-Niger yellowcake link.

If I remember correctly, the forgeries were ridiculously flawed - at the time the docs first came to light, it was possible to google the names of the signators and determine that their dates of office didn't correlate to the date of the docs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. As soon as the Selection was guaranteed
the PNAC went into high gear.

They had been planning for this for years, if not decades.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for posting, have saved to read later! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. House of Bush, House of Saud guy?
remember the big argument about who let whom escape from the US right after 911? He said we let the entire Saudi royal family go, but Richard Clarke, IIRC, did a 180 on that, defending a pal of his in the FBI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. re: this article-
Niewert at Orcinus has written a good article about the Unger article in VF on “black psy-ops” http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2006/06/targets-of-psy-war.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's interesting
to note that you posted a WSJ article attacking Mr. Fitzgerald earlier; in this article, Ledeen's connections with the WSJ are well documented. Small world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Ledeen's name
seems to come up everywhere I look, under every dust bunny...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. This gave me a shiver...
"And you build in subtle, nuanced errors so you can say, 'We would never misspell that.' If it's very cleverly done, it's a chess game, not checkers." I flashed on the anthrax attack on Democratic legislators and The Liberal Media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyDiaper Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
17. Michael A. Ledeen
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 11:06 AM by NastyDiaper
These AEI freaks are the ones who put shrub on his strings. Can Ledeen be flipped?

http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1261
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. You need to check his history more, then
you will have the answer:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. is it on the newstands yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC