Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US outflanked in Eurasia energy politics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:35 PM
Original message
US outflanked in Eurasia energy politics
By F William Engdahl

The United States' global energy-control strategy, it's now clear to most, was the actual reason for the highly costly regime change in Iraq, euphemistically dubbed "democracy" by Washington. But while it is preoccupied with implanting democracy in the Middle East, the United States is quietly being outflanked in the rush to secure and control major energy sources of the Persian Gulf, the Central Asian Caspian Basin, Africa and beyond.

The quest for energy control has informed Washington's support for high-risk "color revolutions" in Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Belarus and Kyrgyzstan in recent months. It lies behind US activity in West Africa, as well as in Sudan, source of 7% of China's oil imports. It lies behind US policy vis-a-vis President Hugo Chavez' Venezuela and President Evo Morales' Bolivia.

In recent months, however, this strategy of global energy dominance has shown signs of producing just the opposite: a kind of "coalition of the unwilling", states that increasingly see no other prospect, despite traditional animosities, but to cooperate to oppose what they see as a US push to control the future security of their energy.

If the trend of recent events continues, it won't be US-style democracy that is spreading, but rather Russian and Chinese influence over major oil and gas supplies.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/HF10Dj01.html
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
IMO the actual wars are sqirmishes over the control of decreasing essential ressources. The major one is to come...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. We have always been at war with East Asia
Sorry, saw the name and couldn't resist ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was just a matter of time
WW2=Japan's thirst and NEED for oil.

It is no different than for India China and other countries where people also desire the 'good life'.

180

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The only problem is
instead of putting money into R&D of new sources of energy were throwing billions fighting over what is left of older sources
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Combine that with this unreported warning..
Russian and China warn of space arms race
STEPHANIE NEBEHAY IN GENEVA

CHINA and Russia yesterday warned that space-based weapons would pose as great a threat as weapons of mass destruction, and called for global negotiations to stop their deployment.

Diplomats said the appeals from the two powers were mainly targeted at the United States, expected by some to leave open the option of putting weaponry in orbit when it issues a new space policy soon.
Advert for Van Gogh print in The Scotsman this Saturday

The United Nations Conference on Disarmament is focusing talks this month on the prospects for launching negotiations on the prevention of an arms race in outer space. The United States and Britain are virtually alone among the forum's 65 member states in opposing the start of the negotiations.

"A world free of outer space weapons is no less important than a world free of the weapons of mass destruction," China's ambassador, Cheng Jingye, told the conference.
.
.<snip>

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=849472006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC