|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:14 PM Original message |
VIDEO- Mark Warner Waffles about Bush Breaking the Law-Spying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. then bring on the likes of hackett |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. So why is Hackett running |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Because the guy he is running against DID sit it out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. DLC. Are you surprised? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackpan1260 (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not great, but I still like him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PWRinNY (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. Chicken! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
6. Why do you want little Georgie S. to PUSH someone into making a statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. No, I want a Dem running for office to say, clearly, that the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Feingold has, and he sure sounds like he's running. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. So then your litmus test - any Dem candidate MUST call for impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:41 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Oh, please, one does not follow the other..... to say that you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Wait just a second |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. That's not waffling... one can have a strong opinion that someone is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Oh, please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. We don't agree about this... the problem I had with Kerry is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 01:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. The appropriate answer to Stephanop's Dem-bait question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. You're making the same argument that Alito no doubt used in his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Alito's going to get confirmed, ain't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. As I said, we don't agree-it isn't "shouting powerlessly" to speak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. If you don't think Alito will get confirmed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PWRinNY (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Because Warner hasn't taken a stand on ANYTHING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. Warner did not answer that question well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
11. Warner is not ready for prime time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. As always, thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upfront (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. He Sold Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
21. I only watched for a few minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
26. I caught that and was not pleased. He sounded weak and indecisive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Dunham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-15-06 01:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Feingold is not going to be the nominee so he can answer these issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC