|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:04 AM Original message |
"the House would have moved to expell him" had ABC not broke the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. Jane Harman saying Dems should have been informed of situation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. she says it is going to the Ethics committee only because Dems made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
2. Newt making it sound like Repugs were aggressively investigating!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
3. Then why didn't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:08 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. gee, Newt did not say WHY!---he is making claims and expects people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
5. Is Newt saying he's known about this for a year, too?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:10 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:13 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Sounds like it to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peekaloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
6. That Tadpole is full of horseshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
7. Bull and shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:09 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. yup--but he is spinning it for the Fox crowd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AIJ Alom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
11. Blatant lie. The House leadership couldn't even remember if they had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:13 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. of course it is a lie----but Newt makes claims -like the WH does_ as if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaliraqvet26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
12. what a filthy liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slater71 (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:17 AM Response to Original message |
15. Yeah, after the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AIJ Alom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:31 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. meaning that they knew about this and did nothing for political gain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
17. Then why didn't they run someone else in the upcoming election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
18. Does Faux providing cover for the Gang Of Pedophiles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
19. Yea, right. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
20. Sure, well after the elections and out of sight of tv cameras. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
21. Question: If newt gets the nod for the next GOP run, will we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-01-06 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
22. This is a new angle on the spin--blame ABC (via Newt-and Wallace did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC