Removing pages from congress is very Talibanesque

[SoCalDem]

The logic is that those pages are just too darned "attractive" and it's asking too much of the adult congressmen to leave them alone, so they must be hidden away/removed..

Kind of like sequestering women in walled off courtyards or under yards of heavy dark fabric, lest a lustfal man catch a glimpse of a sexy wrist or a wisp of hair...

What's next?

public stoning for the wayward page who dares to smile at a passing congressman?

[liberal N proud]

1. Yeah, Those blue blazers they wear are just too cute

RIIIIGGGHT!

[Coventina]

2. You got it! It's the witchburnings all over again.

"That woman makes me tingle in a naughty place. She must be casting a spell on me! WITCH!!!!!"

[BattyDem]

3. So it's the page's fault that a Congressman can't keep it in his pants

You ever notice how the "party of responsibilty" never takes any? :eyes:

[ixion]

4. yeah, pretty pathetic, ain't it?

It basically says this: "we cannot be trusted."

And it's true, they can't.

[cspanlovr]

5. Remove the congressmen from congress, let the pages run the show.

Bet they do a better job.

[Old and In the Way]

6. They certainly could do no worse....

Pretty sad, but true, point.

[SoCalDem]

7. They would certainly do a better job..

The goofballs we have there now, seem to be only interested in maling money for themselves and their pals..and the occasional tryst with a kid