Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A U.S. Fortress Rises in Baghdad:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:07 PM
Original message
A U.S. Fortress Rises in Baghdad:
Asian Workers Trafficked to Build World's Largest Embassy
David Phinney, Special to CorpWatch

http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27618&hd=0&size=1&l=e

Pctpber 20, 2006

John Owen didn’t realize how different his job would be from his last 27 years in construction until he signed on with First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting in November 2005. Working as general foreman, he would be overseeing an army of workers building the largest, most expensive and heavily fortified US embassy in the world. Scheduled to open in 2007, the sprawling complex near the Tigris River will equal Vatican City in size.

Then seven months into the job, he quit.

Not one of the five different US embassy sites he had worked on around the world compared to the mess he describes. Armenia, Bulgaria, Angola, Cameroon and Cambodia all had their share of dictators, violence and economic disruption, but the companies building the embassies were always fair and professional, he says. The Kuwait-based company building the $592-million Baghdad project is the exception. Brutal and inhumane, he says "I’ve never seen a project more fucked up. Every US labor law was broken."

In the resignation letter last June, Owen told First Kuwaiti and US State Department officials that his managers beat their construction workers, demonstrated little regard for worker safety, and routinely breached security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AIJ Alom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Freedom is on the march....to oblivion !!!
We're spreading Freedom in the Middle East, freedom in Iraq. Pay no attention to the liberal media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Freedom is on the Death March... building Pyramids in Egypt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. It will become the biggest white elephant in
history. How appropriate for the Rethug Neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is just another example of the Bush administration's obscene
incompetence. With rampant unemployment in Iraq, they are using imported slave labor to build the US embassy. God damn those morons to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. ''I've never seen a project more fucked up.''
Easy to see why. Remember who got those administrative jobs:



Ties to GOP Trumped Know How

Ties to GOP Trumped Know-How Among Staff Sent to Rebuild Iraq
Early U.S. Missteps in the Green Zone


By Rajiv Chandrasekaran
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, September 17, 2006; A01

Adapted from "Imperial Life in the Emerald City," by Rajiv Chandrasekaran, copyright Knopf 2006

After the fall of Saddam Hussein's government in April 2003, the opportunity to participate in the U.S.-led effort to reconstruct Iraq attracted all manner of Americans -- restless professionals, Arabic-speaking academics, development specialists and war-zone adventurers. But before they could go to Baghdad, they had to get past Jim O'Beirne's office in the Pentagon.

To pass muster with O'Beirne, a political appointee who screens prospective political appointees for Defense Department posts, applicants didn't need to be experts in the Middle East or in post-conflict reconstruction. What seemed most important was loyalty to the Bush administration.

O'Beirne's staff posed blunt questions to some candidates about domestic politics: Did you vote for George W. Bush in 2000? Do you support the way the president is fighting the war on terror? Two people who sought jobs with the U.S. occupation authority said they were even asked their views on Roe v. Wade .

Many of those chosen by O'Beirne's office to work for the Coalition Provisional Authority, which ran Iraq's government from April 2003 to June 2004, lacked vital skills and experience. A 24-year-old who had never worked in finance -- but had applied for a White House job -- was sent to reopen Baghdad's stock exchange. The daughter of a prominent neoconservative commentator and a recent graduate from an evangelical university for home-schooled children were tapped to manage Iraq's $13 billion budget, even though they didn't have a background in accounting.

The decision to send the loyal and the willing instead of the best and the brightest is now regarded by many people involved in the 3 1/2 -year effort to stabilize and rebuild Iraq as one of the Bush administration's gravest errors. Many of those selected because of their political fidelity spent their time trying to impose a conservative agenda on the postwar occupation, which sidetracked more important reconstruction efforts and squandered goodwill among the Iraqi people, according to many people who participated in the reconstruction effort.

The CPA had the power to enact laws, print currency, collect taxes, deploy police and spend Iraq's oil revenue. It had more than 1,500 employees in Baghdad at its height, working under America's viceroy in Iraq, L. Paul Bremer, but never released a public roster of its entire staff.

SNIP...

Haveman's critics, including more than a dozen people who worked for him in Baghdad, contend that rewriting the formulary was a distraction. Instead, they said, the CPA should have focused on restructuring, but not privatizing, the drug-delivery system and on ordering more emergency shipments of medicine to address shortages of essential medicines. The first emergency procurement did not occur until early 2004, after the Americans had been in Iraq for more than eight months.

CONTINUED...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/16/AR2006091600193.html



Thanks for the info, DiktatrW. One brave contractor, Mr. Owen is.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mark my words, we will leave that embassy like we left the one in Saigon
We will be forced out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not that they care
The bUSH buddies got their multi million dollar contracts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. yep, and. . . wait for it. . .
they'll profit from the reconstruction of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Until then it will be a magnificent symbol for insurgents.
What the fuck is wrong with this Bush gang? Oh,nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. They might as well paint a Vatican-sized bullseye on it
It will become the most valued target for destruction when the Iraqi revolution comes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Choppers on the roof... yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. If he wasn't already working, they should hire Gerald McRainey
to replace him. He did a great job in Deadwood.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Swearingen and the Innkeeper (McCall?) would make a great Cheney/Bush n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Did they hire Karen Hughes to be the hostess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Has anyone taken any pictures of the new embassy?
I figure anyone who got caught photographing it would be Gitmoed post haste. However I do think it would be a good thing for the people here to see what the US is doing, all the while claiming to have no interests in staying in Iraq for the long term.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Found this in the Archives. Picture and article.
When there is talk of leaving Iraq I think that * would never leave this. He has plans he still hasn't told us.http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7374-2162249,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. hope the roof can hold a helicopter, they're going to need it for
the airlift thats coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. A Crusader Castle to put in the moat.
how appropriate. Enter Saladin, stage left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Embassy builing is as pathetic as 20 million for Iraq war celebration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. palace of babel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. Funny, I thought we were going to make Iraq safe and democratic
Why should we have to build Barad-Dur to keep our ambassador safe?

(Hey, they started the LoTR references :))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Where's the MSM on this?
Nevermind.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
21. Highlights: "Managers beat their construction workers",
"poor sanitation, squalid living conditions and medical malpractice..."

Apparently, some of the workers were tricked into going to Iraq :grr:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. FREEDOM SLAVES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC