Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Talent pulls 'misleading' Senate ads

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:28 AM
Original message
Talent pulls 'misleading' Senate ads

By Steve Oslica, News Editor. Posted October 27, 2006.

Sen. Jim Talent, R-Mo., pulled campaign ads using “misleading” quotes from the Kansas City Star after the newspaper complained that the quotes were used out of context.

“At the meeting with our editorial board, he defended the ads,” Editorial Page Editor Miriam Pepper said. She said Talent’s staff later confirmed to the Star that the ads had been pulled.

The ads attempted to use the quotes as the opinion of the Star itself. The quotes, however, are not the opinion of the Star or its editorial board.

The Star learned of the quotes from a report by the ad verification Web site Factcheck.org. The organization’s report, “Talent for Deception,” claimed that four ads from Talent’s campaign used out-of-context quotes from the Star about his opponent, State Auditor Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.

more . . .
http://www.themaneater.com/article.php?id=25216

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good. That just makes him look worse. Now he can be labeled
as a LIAR too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. He is also a weasel
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Even though he pulled the ads
he still got his lying message out there.
This is the same technique lawyers use in the courtroom. They will use all sort of inflammatory questioning to make their point, there will be an objection by the other side, and the judge will instruct the jury to disregard the previous testimony.

Once the information has reached the jurors ears, there is no way they will not consider it. It is like telling someone to not think of an elephant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. But pulling it also sends a message
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. the ad must not have been working
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC