Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RePUKES open up shameful new line of attack on Fox - he's ignorant!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 02:43 PM
Original message
RePUKES open up shameful new line of attack on Fox - he's ignorant!
Edited on Sun Oct-29-06 02:48 PM by jefferson_dem
I kid you not. These fuckers have absolutely no shame! Their hole gets deeper as they keep digging...

First, chimp apologist York of NRO spouts the marching orders then the proverbial scum-sucking knuckle-draggers at freeperville carry them out ...


****


THE REAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR MICHAEL J. FOX

Forget the argument over Fox's appearance in his ad for Claire McCaskill. The real point is this: Fox has not even read Missouri's Amendment 2, the initiative at the heart of the issue. From ABC's "This Week" with George Stephanopoulos:

Stephanopoulos: In the ad now running in Missouri, Jim Caviezel speaks in Aramaic. It means, "You betray me with a kiss." And his position, his point, is that actually even though down in Missouri they say the initiative is against cloning, it's actually going to allow human cloning.

Fox: Well, I don't think that's true. You know, I campaigned for Claire McCaskill. And so I have to qualify it by saying I'm not qualified to speak on the page-to-page content of the initiative. Although, I am quite sure that I'll agree with it in spirit, I don't know, I— On full disclosure, I haven't read it, and that's why I didn't put myself up for it distinctly.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YmNhZjc2MjU1Nzk5MzU1MGFhOWEyOTg5ZWRlYmUzNTk=


****


Michael J. Fox admits IgnoranceThis Week with steffi ^ | 10/29/06 | ez


Posted on 10/29/2006 9:20:02 AM PST by ez


Did anyone notice that Micheal J. Fox admitted on ABC this morning that he had not read the initiative he campaigned for? It happens at 4:23 of his interview with steffi.

Go to the ABC News website and do a search for Micheal J. Fox and you can view it.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: ADULTSTEMCELLS; JIMTALENT; MICHAELJFOX; MISSOURI; STEMCELLS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-123 next last
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anyone with video capture may wish to post that admission at Youtube or elsewhere.

1 posted on 10/29/2006 9:20:03 AM PST by ez
< Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: ez
Yup, heard it...it'll be ignored by the rest of the LSM...



2 posted on 10/29/2006 9:21:26 AM PST by pookie18 ( Clinton Happens...as does Dr. Demento Dean, Bela Pelosi & Benedick Durbin!!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: pookie18
Found the transcript

Stephanopoulos: In the ad now running in Missouri, Jim Caviezel speaks in Aramaic. It means, "You betray me with a kiss." And his position, his point, is that actually even though down in Missouri they say the initiative is against cloning, it's actually going to allow human cloning.

Fox: Well, I don't think that's true. You know, I campaigned for Claire McCaskill. And so I have to qualify it by saying I'm not qualified to speak on the page-to-page content of the initiative. Although, I am quite sure that I'll agree with it in spirit, I don't know, I— On full disclosure, I haven't read it, and that's why I didn't put myself up for it distinctly.



3 posted on 10/29/2006 9:25:03 AM PST by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: ez
On full disclosure, I haven't read it, and that's why I didn't put myself up for it distinctly.
Uh ... what?


4 posted on 10/29/2006 9:29:24 AM PST by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: ez
" I am quite sure that I'll agree with it in spirit ...that's why I didn't put myself up for it distinctly"

Huh??



5 posted on 10/29/2006 9:30:07 AM PST by Felis_irritable
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: ez
RUSH WAS RIGHT AGAIN!!

Rush will never get the credit - but he's finally broken through the "infallable" spokesperson mystique.

Maybe next time Fox will take the time to read the legislation before he starts supporting it.



6 posted on 10/29/2006 9:30:30 AM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies >


<SNIP>

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1728031/posts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Keep On Rotting In The Freep World...
I just can't fathom how these people got to thinking this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. You're assuming that they have brains.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpoffdaplanet Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. What idiots
He's not campaigning for the amendment, never claimed to be.

He's supporting a candiate.

Freepers are completely and utter morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. He isn't supporting the campaign for the amendment
He is supporting Claire McCaskill. Stoopid idiot pukes needed to watch the WHOLE interview. But I guess they couldn't stay away from their video games that long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. the sympathy/compassion for MJF far far outweighs anything these
assclowns have to say. Crap like the FR remarks represent dumbass parsing that the average person is just not doing. I didn't see the interview but it sounds like MJF is quite open in clarifying that he isn't endorsing the initiative per se but McCaskill's candidacy. They are just desperate loons who are pissed off that the so-called LSM (yuk yuk -- blech) isn't "seeing things their way"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Keep digging
Edited on Sun Oct-29-06 02:54 PM by C_U_L8R
the rethugs and freeps seemingly
love to prove again and again
what hateful little shitheads they are.

Lord help anyone who depends on them
for care or compassion... they'll only find
this sort of abuse these (c)reeps excel at.

They're tombstoning themselves...
and right on time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm intrigued by this freeper comment:
Rush will never get the credit - but he's finally broken through the "infallable" spokesperson mystique.


What infallable spokesperson mystique? It's a RW loony creation of the past few months, a construct to justify their inability to counter truth with anything but slander. Go on, wingnuts! You're invited to address anyone and anything you disagree with. It's America, don't you remember? But when you attack the 9/11 widows or Michael J. Fox or anyone else who has been or will be harmed by this administrations poor decisions and willful negligence, you have to be prepared to weather the storm of rational blowback. That's the way things work in America. Love it or leave it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Christopher Reeve never got a chance to read it, either.
My FIL had PD. He couldn't read any print whatsoever for the last few years of his life.

Shame on them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. WHAT THE HELL!!!!!!!!!!???????
I am so fucking tired of these assholes! These fucking assholes are so stupid. MY GOD, were they dropped on their heads?

He was not campaigning for it. He was campaigning for Claire McCaskill, her campaign is the one which paid for the ad. Whoever in MO is for amendment 2 would have had to pay for and endorse the commercial if it was for Amendment 2.

What does fucking federal money have to do with a state initiative? It doesn't have anything to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. i haven't talked to anyone, left, right or center that wasn't totally pissed off
about the attacks on MJ Fox, my neighbor is a fundie and she's not a supporter of stem cell but she said she and many in her congregation were outrage about how Fox was being treated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. You know on top of that these people have a lot of guts...
calling him ignorant! If it weren't for their BS, we would be six years to closer to practical use of embryonic stem cells, not fifteen years! Son of a bitch, this is fucking over the line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Now sludge has picked it up along with video link
Edited on Sun Oct-29-06 03:21 PM by jefferson_dem
Have a look at the vid snippet. They think this will lend credibility to their argument!?! Fuckers!

http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/29/video-fox-admits-he-has-not-reviewed-missouris-stem-cell-amendment/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. um hello? they're freepers, did you honestly expect any better from them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC