South Dakota a test lab for laws limiting abortion

[question everything]

South Dakota a test lab for laws limiting abortion

By Evelyn Nieves
THE WASHINGTON POST

December 28, 2005

(snip)

South Dakota, those on both sides of the abortion debate agree, has become one of the hardest states in the country in which to obtain an abortion. One of three states in the country to have only one abortion provider – North Dakota and Mississippi are the others – South Dakota, largely because of a strong anti-abortion lobby, is also becoming a leading national laboratory for testing the limits of state laws restricting abortion, both opponents and advocates of abortion rights say.

In 2005, the South Dakota legislature passed five laws restricting abortion, after a bill to ban abortion outright had failed by one vote in 2004. And new laws are virtually assured for the coming year. A 17-member abortion task force, made up largely of staunch abortion opponents, issued recommendations to the legislature earlier this month that included some of the most restrictive requirements for abortion in the country.

The report states that science defines life as beginning at conception and recommends a law that gives fetuses the same protection that children get after birth, thus banning abortion. Until such a ban, the task force recommends requiring that a woman watch an ultrasound of her fetus, that doctors warn women about the psychological and physical dangers of abortion, and that women receive psychological counseling before the abortion, among other measures.

Nonetheless, each week, 15 to 20 or so women from across South Dakota find their way to the Sioux Falls Planned Parenthood for an abortion, no easy feat for many of them. South Dakota is home to some of the poorest counties in the country, including the poorest, Buffalo County, seat of the Crow Creek Sioux reservation. State law forbids any public funding for the $450 procedure, even in the case of rape or incest. Beyond cost, there is the distance. It's a long slog here from places such as Rapid City, about 350 miles away in the western part of the state. For some women, the only way to do it – and not pay for a hotel room – is to make the 700-mile trip in one day.

(snip)

Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20051228/news_1n28abort.html

[Solo_in_MD]

1. Similar article on SFGATE

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/12/28/MNG2SGDUJ11.DTL&type=printable

Points out that they also have to bring in doctors from out of state.

[Lars39]

2. How many women have died because some frickin' holier than thous

decided that they knew how to practice medicine? :mad:
<snip>
Women in the western side of the state don't think about abortion until they need to," said Kate Looby, Planned Parenthood's state director, "and then they're completely shocked that there's no way to receive that care unless they go to Sioux Falls." Even women in a medical or life-threatening emergency have only one hospital to go to that will perform an emergency abortion, she added. "One hospital. In the entire state, again in Sioux Falls."

[Lars39]

3. More folks need to read this!

:kick: