|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 11:38 AM Original message |
Why Not REQUIRE All Tax Exempt Organizations To Publicly Disclose All Receipts/Disbursements? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is already done for tax exempt municipalities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
2. It would be a violation of privacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 11:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Charitable tax-exempt orgs are required to list their donors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 12:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. It would apply to religious organizations across the board, and quasi-religious entities as well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 12:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Contrary to your premise, there is no 'privacy right' that extends to anonymous gifting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 12:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Then I'm wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 12:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. They can always choose to give to organizatioons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. respectable nonprofits already do this . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 12:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. It is your option 'stay away' but the entity's information remains undisclosed.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
11. Rightwing Conserv Fundamentalists Were Shocked To Find Their $ funded gambling interests... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. My school district does this already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC