Negative attention is better than no attention
Wonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Nov-30-06 06:58 AM
Original message
Poll question: Negative attention is better than no attention
ie. 'Say what you want about me, as long as you spell my name right.' Discuss?
Wonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Nov-30-06 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Drudge seems to think so. Limbaugh seems to think so.
Scarborough seems to think so. Coulter seems to think so. :shrug: I could go on...
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Nov-30-06 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think reading DU should answer that question for you.
ClintonTyree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Nov-30-06 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not the attention grabbing type...
I'd rather be invisible, doing my work far from the eyes and ears of those watching. I want to leave the smallest footprint possible, if any at all.
dipsydoodle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Nov-30-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Technically the answer is yes
Negative attention is actually a positive statement whereas no attention is bland indifference.
Lilith Velkor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu Nov-30-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
on whether the negative attention consists of words or bullets.
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Sat May 04th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.