I just heard lou dobbs say he was going to be on the north american union

[madokie]

that bush* has signed onto without any congress input anyway this ought to be good.

[angry_chuck]

1. North American Union to Replace USA?

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

Forget Greenbacks! I want my Ameros!

DOWN WITH FASCISM! DOWN WITH BUSH!

[angry_chuck]

2. at the end of that article

the guy seems like he is in favor of the tactics employed by the minutemen. I am sorry if that detracts from the point I wanted to establish: Bush wants to erase the borders becuase it is a part of his daddy's new world order (which GH mentioned by name in a speech delivered on spetember 11, 1990 ~ 11 years to the day before 9.11 'terrorist' attacks) in which one government will control everything.


The Constitution for the united States of America and its Bill of Rights will be scrapped. A parliamentary form of government will take its place. All military forces and individuals are to be disarmed except for an internal police force which will carry only the minimum weapons needed to maintain internal order.

"When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans... And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make people safer in their communities." President Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV

"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans ..." Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)

The only military force will be a world police force under the United Nations in sufficient numbers with state-of-the-art technology so that it can field overwhelming force against any perceived threat to the world supra government - see State Department Publication 7277.

The ultimate "secret" is the method of controlling large numbers of fools with the promise of a "secret" which they are led to believe will make them one of the "elect". The goal is the elimination of all religion save theirs, the elimination of all nation states, and complete control and ownership of everything, and everyone, everywhere, every moment of every day, forever.

Meaningful discussion and contemplation of the architecture of modern political power depends on an understanding of cultural context. From this context comes the vocabulary of subjection. The long and sordid history of autocracy is clear enough — such regimes are little more than naïve scale-ups of tribal society, intellectually easy to dismiss, and with the proliferation of alternative systems, easy to oust because unpopular. The real hazard now resides within those very alternatives, specifically in those that are mated to a religious ideology, and promise divine reward for obedience, and wrath both earthly and divine for defiance. Theocratic systems like the Islamism of Iran and Saudi Arabia are evidently dangerous and harmful, but the foremost such system is socialism. Socialism is an ideal vehicle for totalitarianism, as the world learned to its chagrin in the twentieth century. But even where it wears a moderate face, it is an effective disguise for authoritarianism, and for the rearrangement of society along feudalistic lines, so that only a tiny oligarchy has actual control of all property — an arrangement that inevitably wastes humanity's potential for constructive achievement.

[angry_chuck]

3. No One Cares?

WTF?