Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I like Bill Richardson, but he will have to fess up on some questions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:21 PM
Original message
I like Bill Richardson, but he will have to fess up on some questions
If we could nominate any one of our candidates based solely on resume, Richardson would win in a walk. He served as both a Congressman, UN Ambassador, Energy Secretary, and as Governor of New Mexico. He's Latino, which could help us in the southwest, and while he's a DLCer, he does have a good record on fiscal policy (he managed to CUT taxes in NM even while most states were forced to raise them.) However, I'm concerned (NOT a "concern troll" type of post) that there are issues out there that could sink his candidacy.

1. The Wen Ho Lee scandal. Wen Ho Lee's imprisonment happened while Richardson was Energy Secretary. He has also been accused of leaking Lee's name to reporters. He has to clarify his involvement, if any.
During testimony about his involvement, he was scolded by Senator Byrd. Byrd said, ""You had a bright and brilliant career, but you will never again receive the support of the U.S. Senate for any office you seek. You have squandered your treasure."

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/06/21/los.alamos/index.html

2. His sex life might be Clintonian in nature. Someone in another thread posted an article about how he's a bit on the flirtatious side with women. Now, many Presidents have had affairs (in the 20th century alone, we had Harding, Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, possibly George HW Bush, and Clinton) but post-Monica, having an affair is a big liability.

3. His claim that he was drafted by the Kansas City Royals, when he wasn't. I've heard that he was told so, but the decision to draft him was an error. Does anyone know more about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. "His sex life might be Clintonian in nature."
Mother Theresa's sex life *might* have been Clintonian in nature. Does anyone have proof about Richardson, or just allegations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm assuming they are allegations
But they need to be addressed quickly before the MSM attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Two others from a New Mexican
Why, when you campaigned on ending the regressive tax on food, was your first action in office to lower the top tax rate on the richest?

(He did, and it caused a massive budget shortfall)

Why, when you finally got around to ending that tax on food three years later, did you give everyone a net tax increase by hiking other taxes and fees too much? Shouldn't you have rolled some of those back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seattleman Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. This is the stuff to consider and investigate
Most of us don't care about their sex lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I am not at all
impressed with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Wen Ho Lee frameup is the only one of the three you named that matters
the rest of it is meaningless padding of your case. Who gives a damn about his sex life as long as what he did, if he did it was not illegal. You didn't mention his slippery and wishy washy takes on the Iraq disaster. But I guess we are entering the season when such rhetoric will prevail in issuing forth from the keyboards of those operatives screenamed "Kerry2008" and "Clark2008"s at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I don't give a damn about those two
But the MSM sure as hell will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Steve Clemmons adds this: (not good)
((Whether or not we are concerned with the sex lives of public figures, this needs to be addressed by Richardson. You can bet the RW will address it ad nauseum.))


snip

I could be wrong -- and I will correct course if that's appropriate down the road -- but as someone who worked with Bill Richardson's staff closely when he was in the House of Representatives as I worked in the Senate as a senior staff member to Senator Jeff Bingaman, I have seen Richardson and his team up close. I know many of those who worked for him then and who worked for him as Secretary of Energy and then at the United Nations -- and now lots of folks who work in his administration in Santa Fe.

The personal activities of candidates and the public ambitions ought not to collide as much as they do in our world -- but there are issues that Richardson needs to address that involve his own blurring of public responsibilities and 'what should be' private behavior.

I will frame this as a "question" for Bill Richardson.

Have you behaved inappropriately or not in public settings with female members of your government administration, jokingly or not? Have you gestured to female public servants and political appointees -- who work as colleagues with you -- and made lewd gestures, specifically pointing to them and then pointing at your crotch with a room full of media and other politicos there in the room?

Much more at:

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/001884.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'd like to know why he didn't pardon Henry McCarty too
aka Billy The Kid. Tiny point but it's about justice. It was shown that the Kid was promised a pardon by Lew Wallace (at least, for his actions during the Lincoln County War), Wallace reneged on his side of it. Richardson could have put things right but refused on grounds of tourism.

Firstly, was tourism really going to suffer if the Kid was pardoned? In fact, since history and the law proved him right, wouldn't he have become a hero, bring in more tax revenue? Secondly, I know this is a tiny point and I know it's now 118 years old and not even a real issue but it's about plain, simple justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why didn't Bill Clinton pardon Keith Richards?
I found out on Huckabee's TDS interview that he pardoned Keith Richards for a misdemeanor from 1975. While I don't like Huckabee, I thought that was a nice gesture of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Fair point
I have no opinions either way on Huckabee (don't know enough about him) and I'll admit it's kind of a silly point, it just seems to me that if you see the opportunity to put something right (i.e. by delivering on the promised pardon), a reasonable man does so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why did he stop any investigation into obvious election issues in 2004? That's what I'd like to know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why does he love NAFTA, CAFTA, and outsourcing so much?
He told some whoppers about free trade agreements during his stint in congress. Even after he left, when the horrible results of those agreements were becoming apparent, he remained on the side of the outsourcing crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. His links to the private prison industry
I want him to explain why he has supported private prison corporatios.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC