|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:21 PM Original message |
Gonzales cites "executive privilege" for witholding 'smoking gun' emails |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. impeachment will happen if this keeps up. republican congress or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Nixon's same arguement--I wonder if this will go to the SC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I think it will but look who's on the SC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. No mystery how the SC would rule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. But then Nixon also thought the Supreme Court would rule in his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColonelTom (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 02:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I'm not sure it's a slam-dunk for BushCo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 02:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. In the past, I would agree, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. So my question is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. US v. Nixon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Thanks Redbear!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColonelTom (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 02:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. The question - whether this is a "generalized assertion of privilege" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. And they supprt the ongoing investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. wouldn't he have to turn docs over to a prosecutor even though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColonelTom (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 02:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. If the privilege is upheld, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. How Nixonian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. kicking and nominating -- are we doomed to repeating Nixon over and over? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merbex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 02:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Yes, compare the people we are talking about and see how- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
18. If he were competent, he'd know he can't use the "executive privilege",... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
19. Executive CYA. Interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC