Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Somebody confirm what I thought I heard on MSNBC?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 10:47 AM
Original message
Will Somebody confirm what I thought I heard on MSNBC?
I was superficially listening to the 'news' while reading the news on the web, and could swear that I heard some fool refering to Milosevic's death as having died in 'captivity'. You know, it is that kind of senseless and sloppy semantic that is going to come back and haunt us in the end. Stupid fucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's dead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wasn't he actually found dead in his prison cell?
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 11:34 AM by Atman
Or so they say. Isn't that kind of like behind being in captivity? My dictionary defines it as "the condition of being imprisoned or confined."

(edited to fix bizarro subject line)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. With all due respect, I have never heard that term used...
to describe the death of a human being. I have heard it used in terms of animals, but not humans. If I am mistaken, please inform me. How would it be if we described those civilan Americans who have died in Iraq as having died in captivity, and let it go at that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yeah, and since when are humans so much different than
animals? Don't use it for animals either, if you are that sensitive. :eyes:

He was a monster. He was imprisoned on trial for crimes against humanity. He died in his cell--in captivity. That is the truth.

Why get so fixated on semantics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Not sensitive, just mindful of the...
semantics. Many times, I have wanted to make statements that could have been just as thoughtless, but thought better of it, based on the notion that the individual was dead, so why dance on the grave. You do, however, bring up an interesting point. That point is this: At this site, there is always a great deal of banter regarding the tone and SEMANTICS used at other boards or in the media. Interesting that the same approach is not in effect when the situation is reversed. Nobody should complain in the future when things are said about other foreign leaders, or even our own, using semantics that may be distasteful to them. Sematics matter. Do you have a difficulty with your eyes? I noticed that they were rolling and thought i would ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Milosevic was a Stalanist Tyrant .....
I shant be crying over his death .... He was vicious, and will not be missed ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Does that make him non-human?
If it does, then I will have no difficulty in changing the tone of my arguments to completely dehumanize those with whom I have a disagreement. I am not defending Milosevic, nor his policies, but let's please remember that he was, after all, human.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. See my below.
It saddens me that, biologically, he is - or most importantly WAS - "human."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. With all due respect....
In Milosovic's case, it goes way beyond disagreeing with someone. Milosovic, by his unspeakably barbaric actions dehumanized himself. You cannot equate someone's arguments that you may disagree with to the actions of a known barbarian that exhibited no human behavior. He got no sympathy from me. In fact, he probably should have been left to the families of his victims for justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, he was hardly a real human.
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 11:02 AM by Clark2008
More like a murderous animal, in the generic sense (I know animals don't "murder").

So, I don't really care if they said he died in captivity. I'm sure the Serbian Muslims are preparing Eid-type feasts at this very moment and dancing in the streets. My husband, who served in the US Army there, pre-war, is tickled shitless over this development. One less murderous thug in the world, says he.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adarling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. its always suspicious when someone like that dies in captivity
they said he had heart problems in the past. Seems fishy though, not sure if they gave an actual account of what he died from. Said in the article that noone knew when he passed. The man was on the same level as Pol Pot and Stalin and Hitler as far as i am concerned and not going to miss him one bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devlzown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. That is an odd choice of words.
I'm used to hearing of some animal in a zoo dying in captivity. I think most people would say that he died in jail or prison or maybe even that he died while incarcerated. To say that something dies in captivity conjures up a certain amount of sympathy for the one being held.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. He supposedly died of natural causes in his prison cell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. He thought he was being poisoned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC