Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Service Employees Union loses NLRB appeal on election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 07:09 PM
Original message
Service Employees Union loses NLRB appeal on election

http://www.midatlanticlabor.com/appiesnet/wordpress/?p=736

By PAUL TUCKER
theunionnewsabe@aol.com

BETHLEHEM, January 4th- The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in Washington, DC ruled against the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Healthcare Pennsylvania Union, which requested the agency conduct a election to determine if employees of Good Shepherd Nursing Home in Bethlehem wanted to be represented by the union.

In the previous edition of the newspaper, it was exclusively reported the Union was awaiting the NLRB decision on when a election would be scheduled and what employees would be eligible to vote.

The SEIU petitioned the NLRB on October 15th, 2008, requesting the agency conduct an Representation Election, to determine if 55 employees of Good Shepherd want the SEIU/Healthcare Pennsylvania, North 2nd Street in Harrisburg, formerly called SEIU/1199P, to be their representative for the purpose of collective bargaining.

According to the petition, obtained by the newspaper through the Freedom of Information Act, the union requested all full-time and regularly part-time certified nursing assistants, unit secretaries, housekeepers, laundry aids, and van drivers employed by the employer at their Schoenersville Road facility in Bethlehem to be eligible to vote. The union requested on their petition all other employees, including Registered Nurses (RN’s), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN’s), business office clerical employees, guards, supervisors, and managerial staff not participate in the union election.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. The petition was denied because it didn't include another facility.
That is wrong wrong wrong!!

That would be like trying to organize employees of a company with facilities in different countries. Under their ruling the employees of a facility in the USA couldn't organize unless employees in countries A, B and C were also included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC