Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fighting for Union Democracy / East Coast Vs. West Coast Longshore Workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-07-07 09:04 PM
Original message
Fighting for Union Democracy / East Coast Vs. West Coast Longshore Workers

http://www.indypendent.org/?p=975

Fighting for Union Democracy / East Coast Vs. West Coast Longshore Workers
By Bennett Baumer
From the April 5, 2007 issue | Posted in National | Email this article

Longshoremen on the docks in Bayonne, NJ. Photo: Antrim Caskey

UNION DEMOCRACY

The Longshore Workers Coalition (LWC) is an upstart faction vying for union democracy in the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA.) The LWC originated as a group of dissident longshore workers challenging faulty election practices employed by union officials during the 2004 ratification of the ILA’s master contract – a labor agreement the workers labeled a “sellout.”During the June 2004 election, workers alleged vote tampering and coercion were used to get the contract. Newark Local 1235 longshoreman Diego Martinez testified he was coerced to vote for an inadequate contract by a union trustee. “After he saw I voted no, he put the paper to the side and said, ‘You don’t understand, you have to vote yes.’”

Teaming with the Association for Union Democracy, who provided legal representation, dissidents from the 15,000-member ILA fought the master contract, which covers wages and benefits for every East Coast port, in federal court.

A federal court judge eventually ruled against the union dissidents – saying that they had not established voter coercion.



EAST COAST VS. WEST COAST LONGSHORE WORKERS

The wages, benefits and political orientation of the East Coast and West Coast longshore worker unions are starkly different. Though each union has a modest membership, their critical role in the ports gives each the potential to bring the nation’s economy to a halt. However, the ILA makes little effort to organize new workers and has not had a coordinated union-wide job action of any significance in decades. New hires on ILA-represented ports earn as much as six dollars less than their West Coast counterparts and garner generally inferior benefits.

At one time members of the same union, West Coast longshore workers broke with the ILA in 1937 over industrial union organizing and the ILA’s stance against the West Coast longshore strike of 1934. The progressive International longshore and Warehouse Union struck against stevedore companies in 2002 over the loss of jobs and benefits, shutting down 29 West Coast ports.

The 2002 strike ended as a defensive victory for port workers, though President Bush threatened military intervention and evoked Taft- Hartley laws to break the West Coast union.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC