Obama's HORRIFIC Deal on Tax Cuts for the Wealthy

[24EvelJustin24]

Run time: 08:47 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9o9zzAyDMM   Posted on YouTube: December 07, 2010 By YouTube Member: 24EvelJustin24 Views on YouTube: 9   Posted on DU: December 08, 2010 By DU Member: 24EvelJustin24 Views on DU: 986

 

[TwilightGardener]

1. There's things that I think are "HORRIFIC", but they usually involve

death and/or dismemberment.

[quark219]

2. Obama, you sorry little pedantic man. You forgot Rule #1 --

You dance with the partner who brung ya.

Two years into your presidency, and you're all but certain to go down in the history books as a curious, inexplicable disappointment.

Nice knowing you, buddy.

[LBJDemocrat]

3. I normally don't care for self-done commentary videos

But this expresses what I feel perfectly.

We need to organize a rally in protest of these policies.

[quark219]

4. +1. Just say "when" and "where" and I'm there. (N/T)

[tickledropstop]

5. k&r

[lastone]

6. this will cost him/us the presidency, this is the last fucking straw - -

regardless of what he has gained for the working class in this country - to cave on this will, is demoralizing this party and pissing off the very people who woke from a political slumber to make phone calls, pound on doors and finally celebrated when we had a man who stood for change! Where is the fight, where is the outrage from this man who repeatedly called these bankrupting tax breaks lubricious!
I think he had the idea that this job would be tough, yet underestimated the way this fucking game is played. This is street-ball and if your not aiming for the head you might as well stay the fuck on the bench. Last time I was remotely this pissed off I was listening to the criminal gwb hawking his fucking book and admitting to authorizing torture.
If your not pissed off your a capitulating coward.

[truth2power]

7. So much of what Obama said doesn't even make sense...

First of all, when I first heard about the 2 years vs. 13 months, tax cuts/UI. Very strange. Why would he agree to such a disparity?

And his remarks about "hostage takers" are just bizarre. Isn't there always the threat of harm to hostages? Someone please give me a scenario where the hostage ISN'T in danger.

Sure, "We're taking your family hostage and we're taking them to Disney World. We'll drop them off on Tues. at your house. Meanwhile, we're demanding ransom." Did anyone else find this statement didn't even make sense? What is wrong with that man?